australian-law-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to australian-law-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Australia's Federal Register of Legislation. Enables searching and fetching Commonwealth Acts with verifiable citations.354 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for U.S. federal law that enables searching the U.S. Code, CFR, Federal Register, case law, and bills, with citation verification against primary sources to prevent hallucinations.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables natural-language search, citation validation, and cross-referencing of Irish statutes and EU law through MCP-compatible clients.84 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Swiss federal legislation metadata via Fedlex, enabling search and retrieval of act details with ELI URIs, SR numbers, and multilingual support.342 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Laws of Malaysia Online portal, fetching and citing Malaysian principal Acts with verifiable citations.358 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server providing AI assistants access to Canadian case law and legislation metadata from CanLII across all jurisdictions, supporting search and citation relationships.713 npm6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes. The only mild ambiguity is between get_law_text and get_law_as_at, but the descriptions make the current-versus-historical distinction explicit. search_law and search_full_text are also separable by title-search versus full-text-search.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as search_law, get_law_text, compare_versions, and verify_citations. The get_ and search_ prefixes group related operations predictably, with no mixed conventions.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a legal research server. Each tool provides a distinct capability without redundancy, and the count feels neither thin nor bloated for the domain.
The toolset covers the core legislative research workflow: finding laws, retrieving current and historical text, checking amendment status, comparing versions, and verifying citations. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose of working with the Federal Register of Legislation.