Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
australian-law-mcp

australian-law-mcp

by ChangkeunJ
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to australian-law-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • au-eli-mcp

      matematicsolutions
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Australia's Federal Register of Legislation. Enables searching and fetching Commonwealth Acts with verifiable citations.
      3
      93 PyPI
      Apache 2.0

    • us-law-mcp

      seelpeed-debug
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for U.S. federal law that enables searching the U.S. Code, CFR, Federal Register, case law, and bills, with citation verification against primary sources to prevent hallucinations.
      11
      MIT

    • ch-eli-mcp

      matematicsolutions
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Swiss federal legislation metadata via Fedlex, enabling search and retrieval of act details with ELI URIs, SR numbers, and multilingual support.
      3
      30 PyPI
      Apache 2.0

    • canlii-mcp

      Vaquill-AI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing AI assistants access to Canadian case law and legislation metadata from CanLII across all jurisdictions, supporting search and citation relationships.
      7
      23 npm
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes. The only mild ambiguity is between get_law_text and get_law_as_at, but the descriptions make the current-versus-historical distinction explicit. search_law and search_full_text are also separable by title-search versus full-text-search.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as search_law, get_law_text, compare_versions, and verify_citations. The get_ and search_ prefixes group related operations predictably, with no mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a legal research server. Each tool provides a distinct capability without redundancy, and the count feels neither thin nor bloated for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the core legislative research workflow: finding laws, retrieving current and historical text, checking amendment status, comparing versions, and verifying citations. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose of working with the Federal Register of Legislation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources