Skip to main content
Glama
ChanghuLiu

England Works Watch

by ChanghuLiu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to England Works Watch

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • meok-eu-platform-worker-mcp

      CSOAI-ORG
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables compliance checking and risk forecasting for the EU Platform Workers Directive (2024/2831), including employment-status presumption, algorithmic management disclosure, and human oversight.
      23 PyPI
      MIT

    • hive-mcp-audit-readiness

      srotzin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Computes multi-jurisdictional AI compliance readiness scores with sourced penalty math, enabling gap analysis and audit tier recommendations.
      MIT

    • io.github.Medxpert-org/ubic

      Medxpert-org
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and builders to run local, audit-traceable governance assessments, including an A³ scorecard, ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST evidence templates, compliance checklists, passport lookup, and sensitive-text screening.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: explaining scope, listing event types, checking source freshness, and assessing impact. There is slight overlap between the info and event-list tools, but the descriptions clarify their different roles.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Two tools use a verb-led pattern (list_supported_change_events, assess_change_impact), while the other two are noun phrases (sponsor_change_checker_info, licensing_source_status). The naming is readable and consistent in style, but not fully uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are well-scoped for this narrow domain: one for context, one for supported events, one for evidence freshness, and one for the core assessment. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the main checker workflow: understanding scope, enumerating supported changes, verifying source freshness, and assessing impact. Minor gaps like returning raw evidence details or a dedicated decision-state lookup are workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources