ArchLang
Related Servers
Alternatives to ArchLang
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceFloor plans, elevations and sections for agents. Draw a room in real millimetres, place doors, windows and tables, validate with typed errors, render deterministic SVG. Free key, no approval.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to automate 2D architectural drafting and CAD file management, including DXF/DWG parsing, SVG/PNG/PDF rendering, wall extrusion to 3D STL meshes, room and beam analysis, block/script library access, and persistent depot storage via a REST API and MCP tools.18MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to generate and locally edit parametric architectural DXF files, run geometry checks and rectangular layout solving, and use traceable research and professional-learning workflows; on Windows it can also attach to a running AutoCAD for guarded read/write operations.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceDeclarative BIM and Building-as-Code engine for AI agents: model buildings in YAML, compute deterministic QTO and cost estimations, compile to IFC4, and view interactive 3D WebGL models.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables an AI assistant to conversationally control Autodesk AutoCAD, drawing, inspecting, and editing plans, and includes a cross-platform DXF engine that runs without AutoCAD on macOS and Linux. It exposes tools for rendering views as images, batching geometry, blocks, and structures, measuring and checking plans, and undoing whole batches.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to drive a live AutoCAD session over stdio with transactional, serialized writes: inspecting and saving documents, managing layers, creating and editing line/circle/arc/polyline/rectangle/text entities, querying selections, setting checkpoints, and exporting DXF. Every request is validated against strict schemas with document revision checks and save-reopen geometry readback, and a headless backend is available when no AutoCAD instance is running.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few pairs require careful reading: fix vs repair both edit source, lint vs validate both report diagnostics, and score vs validate both check intent. The descriptions explicitly delineate these boundaries, so misselection is unlikely but not impossible.
All tool names are single lowercase imperative verbs with no mixed conventions or underscores. The pattern is predictable throughout the set.
Eleven tools is well within the appropriate range for a language tooling server covering authoring, validation, repair, finishing, and sharing. Each tool appears to earn its place without obvious redundancy.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: completion, compile, validate, lint, fix, repair, suggest, finish, describe, score, and link. Minor gaps like a dedicated format/explain tool are not critical, as compile and diagnostics cover those needs.