get_release_publication_summary

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states the tool does not modify repository files, git state, release state, or configuration, providing good behavioral transparency. However, it does not mention authentication or rate limits, which are relevant for read-only tools.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences, front-loading 'Read-only'. However, it could benefit from brief parameter details without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three parameters and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It omits explanations for workspaceId and includeAssets, and does not describe the return value structure beyond 'sanitized summary'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description only hints at tagName ('for a requested tag') but provides no explanation for optional parameters workspaceId and includeAssets. The agent must guess their purpose from names alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool is read-only and returns a sanitized GitHub release publication summary for a requested tag. It uses a specific verb and resource, but does not differentiate from sibling summary tools like get_release_artifact_summary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It only mentions read-only behavior, but does not specify scenarios or exclusions relative to sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.