Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to computer-use

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable agents to control the macOS mouse and keyboard using screenshots and Quartz-based input events, including app switching, clicks, scrolling, text entry, shortcuts, and action-triggered screenshots.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI MCP clients to control macOS through screenshots, mouse clicks, scrolling and dragging, Unicode keyboard input and shortcuts, clipboard access, and window management, with multi-monitor and Retina coordinate handling plus visual action feedback.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to control macOS via accessibility and screen recording, providing tools to list apps, observe UI, click, type, press keys, and scroll.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate macOS desktop tasks including mouse control, keyboard input, screenshots, window management, and UI interaction.
      10 npm
      415
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to inspect and control macOS applications through Accessibility trees, screenshots, and OCR. It supports clicks, typing, key presses, scrolling, drags, clipboard paste, window actions, and scripted actions via MCP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI to fully control macOS — mouse, keyboard, terminal, screenshots, window management, UI element detection, and provides AI-optimized information reporting.
      36
      29 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct domains (apps, windows, browser tabs, cursor, permissions), but there are overlapping entry points: get_state duplicates app/window/browser listing, browser_manage broadly overlaps the browser_* family, and batch_execute vs js both serve multi-step orchestration. Descriptions help, but an agent can reasonably hesitate between these alternatives.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are consistently snake_case and grouped by prefix (browser_*, window-related), but the convention is mixed: some are verb_noun (list_apps, get_window_state) while others are noun_verb/noun phrases (window_action, browser_tab_state, cursor_control, batch_execute, browser_manage) and a few are bare nouns (permissions, js). Readable, but not a predictable verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    17 tools is at the heavy end of the 3-15 guideline, and the surface includes broad mega-tools (browser_manage, window_action, browser_tab_action) alongside overlapping orchestration tools (batch_execute, js). Given the broad computer-use scope it is defensible, but it feels overloaded rather than tightly scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across macOS apps/windows, browsers, cursor overlays, batching, scripting, and permissions, with lifecycle management for windows and browser tabs. Minor gaps remain: no explicit app quit/terminate operation, and global system-level controls are absent, but agents can work around these via window/browser close or js.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues