pause_resume_training

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses that the tool may perform a dry-run instead of the actual action if SSH configuration is missing, which is a key behavioral trait. However, it does not detail error handling, side effects, or authentication requirements beyond SSH.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 13 words, front-loading the core purpose and key condition. Every word earns its place with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists, return format is covered. However, with 0% parameter schema coverage, the description should have clarified allowed values for 'action' and 'job_id' format. It is minimally adequate but missing critical param details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the parameters 'action' or 'job_id'. It does not specify expected values for 'action' (e.g., 'pause', 'resume') or format for 'job_id', leaving the schema's minimal info uncompensated.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool pauses or resumes a remote training job via SSH, providing a specific verb, resource, and mechanism. It distinguishes from purely dry-run tools like dry_run_remote_config by indicating real execution is contingent on configuration.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context: it's a dry-run unless FTOS_SSH_* environment variables are set, guiding the agent on when actual execution occurs. However, it does not explicitly mention when to use this tool over siblings like dry_run_remote_config or provide exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.