MCP Contract Auditor
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_chainsA | List all supported EVM chains for contract auditing |
| fetch_contractA | Fetch verified smart contract source code and ABI from Blockscout |
| scan_vulnsC | Scan Solidity source code for common security vulnerabilities (reentrancy, overflow, access control, etc.) |
| check_holdersB | Analyze token holder distribution for centralization and rug-pull risk |
| audit_contractA | 🔒 FULL AUDIT: Fetch contract source, scan for vulnerabilities, analyze holders, generate report. One-stop smart contract audit. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Tools are largely distinct with clear purposes. However, `audit_contract` is a composite that includes functionality of `scan_vulns` and `check_holders`, which could cause some confusion, but descriptions clarify the difference.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., audit_contract, list_chains), making it easy for an agent to predict tool names.
Five tools is well-scoped for a contract auditor server, covering the essential operations without being overwhelming or insufficient.
The tool set covers fetching, scanning, holder analysis, and full auditing with chain listing. Missing features like audit history or detailed chain info are minor gaps.