search_captchala_docs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions returning 'most relevant doc sections' but omits details like ordering, result limits, authentication, or pagination. Incomplete for a search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, no fluff. Could be more structured (e.g., bullet points for details), but effectively communicates core purpose without waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description should explain return format. 'Returns the most relevant doc sections' is vague—lacks detail on what a 'section' contains. Adequate but not complete for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter 'query' with schema description 'Search terms to look for in the CaptchaLa docs.' Description adds no new meaning beyond this. With 100% schema coverage, baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool searches the CaptchaLa documentation and returns relevant sections. The verb 'Search' and resource 'CaptchaLa documentation' are specific. It is distinct from siblings like get_captchala_doc (retrieves specific doc) and validation tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage: use when needing to find relevant doc sections. No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives like get_captchala_doc. Lacks when-not-to-use or context for choosing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.