Skip to main content
Glama
Cappybara12

OpenXAI MCP Server

by Cappybara12

load_model

Load pre-trained machine learning models for AI explanation benchmarking by specifying dataset and model type.

Instructions

Load a pre-trained model from OpenXAI

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
data_nameYesName of the dataset the model was trained on
ml_modelYesType of machine learning model (ann, lr, rf, svm, xgb)
pretrainedNoWhether to load a pretrained model

Implementation Reference

  • The core handler function for the 'load_model' tool. Validates the model type, generates a Python code snippet using OpenXAI's LoadModel class, and returns a formatted response with model information and usage example.
      async loadModel(dataName, mlModel, pretrained = true) {
        const modelInfo = {
          ann: 'Artificial Neural Network',
          lr: 'Logistic Regression',
          rf: 'Random Forest',
          svm: 'Support Vector Machine',
          xgb: 'XGBoost'
        };
    
        const modelName = modelInfo[mlModel];
        if (!modelName) {
          throw new Error(`Model type '${mlModel}' not supported. Available models: ${Object.keys(modelInfo).join(', ')}`);
        }
    
        const codeExample = `
    # Example usage with OpenXAI:
    from openxai import LoadModel
    
    # Load the pre-trained model
    model = LoadModel(data_name='${dataName}', ml_model='${mlModel}', pretrained=${pretrained})
    
    # Use the model for predictions
    # predictions = model.predict(input_data)
    `;
    
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: `Model loaded successfully!\n\n` +
                    `Dataset: ${dataName}\n` +
                    `Model type: ${modelName} (${mlModel})\n` +
                    `Pretrained: ${pretrained}\n\n` +
                    `Python code example:\n\`\`\`python${codeExample}\`\`\``
            }
          ]
        };
      }
  • Input schema defining the parameters for the 'load_model' tool: data_name (required string), ml_model (required enum), pretrained (optional boolean).
    inputSchema: {
      type: 'object',
      properties: {
        data_name: {
          type: 'string',
          description: 'Name of the dataset the model was trained on'
        },
        ml_model: {
          type: 'string',
          description: 'Type of machine learning model (ann, lr, rf, svm, xgb)',
          enum: ['ann', 'lr', 'rf', 'svm', 'xgb']
        },
        pretrained: {
          type: 'boolean',
          description: 'Whether to load a pretrained model',
          default: true
        }
      },
      required: ['data_name', 'ml_model']
    }
  • index.js:91-114 (registration)
    Tool registration in the list of available tools returned by ListToolsRequestSchema, including name, description, and input schema.
    {
      name: 'load_model',
      description: 'Load a pre-trained model from OpenXAI',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          data_name: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Name of the dataset the model was trained on'
          },
          ml_model: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Type of machine learning model (ann, lr, rf, svm, xgb)',
            enum: ['ann', 'lr', 'rf', 'svm', 'xgb']
          },
          pretrained: {
            type: 'boolean',
            description: 'Whether to load a pretrained model',
            default: true
          }
        },
        required: ['data_name', 'ml_model']
      }
    },
  • Dispatch case in the main CallToolRequestSchema handler that routes 'load_model' calls to the loadModel method.
    case 'load_model':
      return await this.loadModel(args.data_name, args.ml_model, args.pretrained);
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure but offers minimal information. It doesn't describe what 'loading' entails (e.g., whether it returns a model object, loads into memory, requires specific permissions, has side effects, or involves network calls). For a tool that presumably loads complex ML models, this leaves significant behavioral questions unanswered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that gets straight to the point with zero wasted words. It's appropriately sized for a tool with clear parameters documented elsewhere, though this conciseness comes at the cost of completeness in other dimensions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool that loads ML models with 3 parameters and no output schema, the description is insufficiently complete. It doesn't explain what the tool returns (model object? success status?), doesn't address error conditions, and provides minimal behavioral context. Given the complexity of ML model loading and absence of annotations/output schema, the description should do more to help the agent understand what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already fully documents all three parameters. The description adds no additional parameter context beyond what's in the schema - it doesn't explain relationships between parameters, provide examples, or clarify what happens when 'pretrained' is false. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does all the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Load') and resource ('a pre-trained model from OpenXAI'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'list_models' or 'load_dataset', which would require mentioning this is for loading specific model instances rather than listing available models or loading data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of prerequisites, when not to use it, or how it differs from related tools like 'list_models' or 'load_dataset'. The agent must infer usage context from the tool name and parameters alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Cappybara12/mcpopenxAI'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server