Skip to main content
Glama
Canxinner

Noteastic MCP

by Canxinner
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Noteastic MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • simple-mcp-example

      lrvchgost
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables managing local Markdown notes by creating, viewing, listing, and searching notes and their contents through MCP tools.
      -

    • Zettelkasten MCP Server

      Laurai87426
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to create, link, explore, and synthesize atomic notes through MCP-compatible clients, using Markdown files as the source of truth with a searchable SQLite index.
      -

    • @cardmagic/notes

      cardmagic
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      CLI and MCP server to search and browse Apple Notes with fuzzy matching, full-text search, and PDF text extraction.
      19 npm
      7
      MIT

    • Restora

      tahabakri
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that exposes your local Notion backups to AI agents — query databases, read pages, search a backed-up workspace. Offline by default: no LLM calls, no telemetry, no cloud.
      6
      1
      MIT

    • skype-archive-mcp

      jiridudekusy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local browsing and searching of Skype export archives through MCP tools for messages, conversations, participants, and attachment extraction, with privacy-focused local processing.
      3 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct function: backup metadata, backup comparison, library listing/searching, notebook/page inspection, and page/notebook export. The only similar pair is export_page and export_notebook, but their scope is explicitly separated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern: list_library, search_library, get_notebook, get_page_assets, export_page, export_notebook. However, backup_info and changes_since_backup break the pattern, one being noun_info and the other a descriptive phrase.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for a read-only backup analysis and export workflow. Each tool serves a distinct purpose without feeling sparse or bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core backup workflows: understanding the backup, detecting changes, browsing and searching the library, inspecting notebooks and pages, and exporting content. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct extraction of raw page assets or page-level text content, but the main lifecycle is well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources