Skip to main content
Glama
Calevi-Consulting

ssh-mcp-dynamic

by Calevi-Consulting
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ssh-mcp-dynamic

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-ssh-wrapper

      megascope
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server that executes commands on remote hosts by delegating to the local ssh binary, supporting batch-mode execution and optional timeout.
      MIT

    • SSH MCP Server

      aaronckj
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables LLMs to execute shell commands on remote Linux and Windows systems via SSH with configurable timeout and authentication options.
      6,170 npm
      MIT

    • ssh-mcp-server

      wijzeu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      SSH-based MCP server that enables remote execution of SSH commands, file transfers, and secure server management via the MCP protocol.
      ISC

    • ssh-chat-mcp

      aiplatforms-ru
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Zero-config SSH/SFTP MCP server that lets an LLM client open temporary SSH/SFTP sessions to remote hosts, run commands, and upload/download files without holding any pre-baked credentials.
      17
      8 npm
      2
      MIT

    • SSH MCP Server

      mfangtao
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server that enables remote command execution over SSH through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), supporting both password and private key authentication.
      1
      6 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools are very similar—both execute shell commands via SSH—but they are clearly differentiated by the sudo privilege level. An agent could mistake one for the other if not reading carefully, but the descriptions make the distinction explicit.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent pattern: the ssh_ prefix followed by the action, with an optional sudo modifier. ssh_exec and ssh_sudo_exec are predictable and clearly related.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin, even for a focused SSH execution purpose. The count is borderline—functional but minimal—and does not include complementary operations like file transfer or session management.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers command execution with and without sudo, which handles a basic SSH execution workflow. However, the server name suggests a broader SSH scope, and missing operations like file upload/download, connection status, or environment inspection create notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources