feedbin_list_updated_entries

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses that only entry ids are returned and that results are filtered by an updated-after date, but omits auth requirements, pagination behavior, whether deleted or read/star changes are included, and explicit read-only safety context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no redundant or filler text. Every element contributes directly to understanding the operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool this is adequate, and it partially covers return values by saying 'entry ids'. Still, with no output schema or annotations, it leaves default/omitted-since behavior and pagination unclear, so it is not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter has 0% schema description coverage, so the description meaningfully compensates by stating it is optional and expects an ISO 8601 value. It does not specify timezone or inclusive/exclusive boundary semantics, but the core meaning is supplied.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List') and resource ('entry ids updated') with the relevant filter. It is clear on its own, but does not explicitly distinguish itself from siblings such as feedbin_list_entries or feedbin_delete_updated_entries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The mention of an optional 'since' parameter implies incremental/update polling usage. However, it gives no explicit guidance on when to use this versus feedbin_list_entries or feedbin_poll_entries, and no exclusions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.