TradeLab-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to TradeLab-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA 34-tool MCP server that bridges LLMs to MetaTrader 5, enabling EA development, backtesting, optimization, advanced analytics, live trading, and portfolio management.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables quant research, strategy generation, backtesting, and paper trading from natural language prompts, integrating with AI agents via an MCP server.64-

backtest360-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes the Backtest360 backtesting engine API as tools, enabling AI agents to conversationally discover indicators, build and validate strategies, run backtests, and read results.1460 PyPIMIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to compile Expert Advisors, run MetaTrader 5 strategy backtests with arbitrary settings, and receive structured testing results as MCP tools.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides AI agents with financial tools including real-time quotes, backtesting, technical analysis, and multi-exchange data via a simple CLI interface.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables quantitative trading research by providing tools to backtest strategies, list market datasets, review forward-test logs, and search previously rejected hypotheses, all through an MCP interface.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: terminal management, compilation, single/batch/walk-forward backtests, result retrieval/comparison, and EA registry operations. The run-related tools are differentiated by scope and description, so an agent is unlikely to confuse them.
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern such as list_terminals, run_backtest, get_trades, and refresh_ea_registry. A few exceptions like health, compile, ea_capabilities, and walk_forward are readable but break the otherwise consistent convention.
At 18 tools, this is slightly above the typical 3-15 tool sweet spot, but the count is justified by the distinct environment, backtest, results, and EA-registry concerns. Each tool has a clear role and none feel redundant.
Core workflows are well covered: environment health, compilation, backtests, walk-forward, smoke tests, and result inspection/comparison. However, there is no run listing/deletion tool and no direct EA generation/modification tool, which leaves notable gaps in lifecycle management.