Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
CaelixOrbit

Kimi Search MCP

by CaelixOrbit
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Kimi Search MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • deepseek-web

      ruali-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to perform web searches and fetch HTTP(S) pages as Markdown through Search and Fetch APIs.
      2
      67 npm
      MIT

    • deepseek-search

      BryleXia
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and agents to run structured web searches and fetch web pages as Markdown through a search/fetch API, with rate limiting, retry/backoff, request deadlines, and private-address blocking for safer agent use.
      MIT

    • Ollama Web Search

      deXterbed
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables web search and web fetch operations using Ollama's hosted APIs, allowing MCP clients to search the web and retrieve page content.
      2
      28 PyPI
      MIT

    • DeepSeek Search MCP

      CaelixOrbit
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run web searches via DeepSeek's open platform API, with optional web page fetching that returns Markdown content, and supports query syntax for source, language, and time filters.
      1
      89 npm
      1
      MIT

    • ds-websearch-mcp

      prepaser
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables web search and page fetching through the DeepSeek Search and Fetch APIs, exposing search and fetch tools to MCP clients. Supports paginated content retrieval with cursors so long pages can be read in chunks without repeating upstream requests.
      2
      52 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    Let your AI agent see the webWeb-to-screenshot MCP for Claude, Cursor and Codex. No cookie banners. Free to start.snap-render.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools are clearly differentiated by tier: basic returns simple results while pro returns text chunks with relevance scores. An agent can distinguish them, though choosing between basic and pro may still require judgment about cost/quality tradeoffs.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same predictable pattern kimi_search_basic and kimi_search_pro, using a consistent prefix plus a clear tier suffix.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only two tools make the surface thin, but for a focused search server offering two quality tiers this is borderline rather than inappropriate. It earns each tool's place but leaves little room for parameterization or content retrieval.

    Completeness4/5

    For a web search server, basic and pro tiers cover the core capability, including richer output via relevance scores. Minor gaps exist, such as a dedicated content-fetch or pagination tool, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources