Skip to main content
Glama
CaelixOrbit

Kimi Search MCP

by CaelixOrbit
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Kimi Search MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Ollama Web Search

      deXterbed
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables web search and web fetch operations using Ollama's hosted APIs, allowing MCP clients to search the web and retrieve page content.
      2
      MIT

    • codex-search-mcp

      MintOcha
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run live web searches, fetch and navigate readable web pages, search images, capture PDF screenshots, and retrieve finance, weather, sports, and world-time data through a zero-configuration authenticated backend.
      11
      12 npm
      MIT

    • Qianxv-search-mcp

      Limx1994
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run local web searches with automatic failover across multiple search providers and to extract public web pages as titles and Markdown content, using circuit breaking and key-redacted logging.
      -

    • DeepSearch MCP

      yuemingruoan
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables web search and site-specific search capabilities through the Deepsearch model. Provides unified access to broad web retrieval and targeted site search functionality within the MCP ecosystem.
      2
      7 npm
      5
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools are clearly differentiated by tier: basic returns simple results while pro returns text chunks with relevance scores. An agent can distinguish them, though choosing between basic and pro may still require judgment about cost/quality tradeoffs.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same predictable pattern kimi_search_basic and kimi_search_pro, using a consistent prefix plus a clear tier suffix.

    Tool Count3/5

    Only two tools make the surface thin, but for a focused search server offering two quality tiers this is borderline rather than inappropriate. It earns each tool's place but leaves little room for parameterization or content retrieval.

    Completeness4/5

    For a web search server, basic and pro tiers cover the core capability, including richer output via relevance scores. Minor gaps exist, such as a dedicated content-fetch or pagination tool, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources