No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 162 tools
Several tools are near-duplicates (block_insert vs entity_create_block_ref, system_run_lisp vs lisp_execute_code), and save/export and selection/query families overlap heavily (drawing_save vs drawing_save_as vs drawing_export_dxf; selection_window/polygon/filter/entity_select_smart/analysis_select_*). At 162 tools, an agent cannot reliably pick the intended tool without reading every description.
The server mostly uses readable snake_case and strong domain prefixes (drawing_, entity_, layer_, block_, dimension_), but the verb/object order and granularity vary: block_list vs block_create_from_entities, entity_create_block_ref vs block_insert, selection_window vs entity_select_smart, and drawing_audit vs validation_check vs drawing_critique. It is not chaotic, but the consistency is only partial.
162 tools is far beyond the 25+ threshold and well into extreme-mismatch territory for a single server. The surface mixes core CAD primitives with highly specialized one-off workflows (gear drawings, P&ID, Grasshopper, ISO title blocks), forcing enormous tool-selection overhead.
Core CAD lifecycle coverage is broad: files, entities, layers, blocks, text, dimensions, hatches, layouts, viewports, selection, transactions, validation, and export are all represented, and most create/read/update/delete paths are complete. Minor gaps exist (no rename for layers/blocks, no dimension text editing, limited geometry editing for polylines/splines), but agents can usually work around them by delete/recreate.