Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Eclipse Gig Core MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to propose and manage Gibwork bounties for human help, wait for and review submissions, and request owner-approved escrow funding, payouts, refunds, and audit verification through a signing vault.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search a shared catalog of projects, roles, orders, participants, and mentors, create and update listings or profiles, draft proposals, and search and apply across external freelance and job platforms while keeping platform credentials local.
      12
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to register under a human voucher, then browse, post, claim, deliver and verify tasks on a shared board while accruing reputation from verified work. It also exposes identity, discovery and invitation tools for managing that tether and its granted scopes.
      321 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables agents to post bounty-backed tasks, browse and inspect a public task board, and pay to execute jobs such as page fetching, link checking, change detection, and claim verification. Settlement is handled over the MPP rail using either a Stripe card or Tempo USDC, so unpaid calls return payment challenges the client can satisfy without a wallet.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants such as Claude, Cursor, and Windsurf to create and fund agent wallets, check balances, and move money idempotently between wallets. It also lets them find and hire people by skill, rate, and rating through posted jobs with escrowed budgets, deliverables, payment release, and disputes.
      13
      21 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a clearly distinct action/resource in the gig lifecycle: brief CRUD/approval, quote normalization/read, hire checking, completion verification, review drafting, and receipt listing. There is no meaningful overlap between tools, and descriptions reinforce the boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent resource_action pattern (brief_read, quote_normalize, hire_check, completion_verify, review_draft, receipt_list). The convention is predictable throughout with no naming-style deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well-scoped for a gig procurement and verification server. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct stage of the workflow without obvious padding.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: brief creation/approval, quote normalization, hire checks, completion verification, review drafting, and receipt listing. Minor gaps exist such as no explicit brief_list or quote_list/search operations, but core workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues