Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Eclipse Beacon MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Issue and verify signed receipts for agent actions, enabling durable, independently checkable proof of policy decisions. Supports offline verification via get_keyset and verify_receipt tools without an account.
      0
      Inno Setup
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides permission gates and tamper-evident audit logging for AI agent tool executions, with declarative policies, consent ladders, and hash-chained verification.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first, SQLite-backed document store that lets agents keep notes on a verifiable hash chain and receive signed receipts on recall, so it can flag when previously read information has been superseded or retired. An orient call reports what changed since the agent's last cursor, including a drift banner and retraction list, so stale beliefs surface instead of silently misleading.
      2,402 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a clearly distinct operation: write-side ingestion (policy_ingest), read-side retrieval (policy_list / policy_get), and two analytical views (time-based expiry in radar_report vs coverage gaps in gap_report). The two report tools could superficially overlap, but their descriptions explicitly separate temporal alerts from coverage/duplication/premium analysis.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case two-token identifiers, which is easy to read and predict. There is a minor deviation in that policy_* uses a resource prefix with an action second (ingest/list/get), while radar_report and gap_report are noun+report compounds rather than strict verb_noun.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well within a focused, well-scoped surface: one write path, two retrieval paths, and two distinct analyses. No tool looks redundant or padded, and nothing appears to be a trivial wrapper.

    Completeness3/5

    Ingest plus list/get covers creation and reading, but there is no explicit update, delete, or archive path for policies, assets, or persons (re-ingestion is implied but undocumented as an edit mechanism). There is also no way to acknowledge/snooze alerts or export the household graph, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues