Eclipse Beacon MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Eclipse Beacon MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to maintain append-only content history with verified publication and social follow-through outcomes, search for overlaps, and run read-only integrity verification of stored snapshots.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables defining and verifying evidence contracts for claims in READMEs, releases, or product pages using constrained verifiers and generating hash-chained receipts and reports.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceIssue and verify signed receipts for agent actions, enabling durable, independently checkable proof of policy decisions. Supports offline verification via get_keyset and verify_receipt tools without an account.0Inno Setup
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents and applications to record, query, verify, and receive hash-chained event provenance over stdio, supporting self-metering and independent audit of autonomous system activity.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides permission gates and tamper-evident audit logging for AI agent tool executions, with declarative policies, consent ladders, and hash-chained verification.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local-first, SQLite-backed document store that lets agents keep notes on a verifiable hash chain and receive signed receipts on recall, so it can flag when previously read information has been superseded or retired. An orient call reports what changed since the agent's last cursor, including a drift banner and retraction list, so stale beliefs surface instead of silently misleading.2,402 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool maps to a clearly distinct operation: write-side ingestion (policy_ingest), read-side retrieval (policy_list / policy_get), and two analytical views (time-based expiry in radar_report vs coverage gaps in gap_report). The two report tools could superficially overlap, but their descriptions explicitly separate temporal alerts from coverage/duplication/premium analysis.
All names are snake_case two-token identifiers, which is easy to read and predict. There is a minor deviation in that policy_* uses a resource prefix with an action second (ingest/list/get), while radar_report and gap_report are noun+report compounds rather than strict verb_noun.
Five tools is well within a focused, well-scoped surface: one write path, two retrieval paths, and two distinct analyses. No tool looks redundant or padded, and nothing appears to be a trivial wrapper.
Ingest plus list/get covers creation and reading, but there is no explicit update, delete, or archive path for policies, assets, or persons (re-ingestion is implied but undocumented as an edit mechanism). There is also no way to acknowledge/snooze alerts or export the household graph, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.