untapped-plugins
Related Servers
Alternatives to untapped-plugins
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceHosted MCP server for job search (3M+ jobs from employer career pages and ATS feeds like Lever/Greenhouse), PDF resume generation with multiple templates, AI resume tailoring per job description, cover letters, and career advice. Free hosted endpoint, no API key required.3312MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first, open-source MCP server that analyzes jobs, matches your CV, tailors documents, and tracks applications — all on your machine with no data uploaded.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn intelligent, zero-cost MCP server that securely parses local resumes and compares them against live job postings for ATS scoring, skill gap analysis, and interview prep.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn open-source, local-first MCP server for automated Schema.org JSON-LD generation, GA4 metric validation, /llm.txt auditing, and content stickiness analytics.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProduction-ready MCP server integrating Google Search Console, GA4, and PageSpeed Insights for SEO and analytics intelligence, enabling natural-language queries to Google analytics data.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes a perpetual, honest job-application pipeline as typed tools an LLM agent can call, with fit scoring, verified resume building, and a submission planner enforced by code, not prompts.1666 PyPIMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
page_facts handles a single URL's SEO facts while audit_pages extends that to sitemaps or lists with cross-page problems. The single-vs-bulk boundary is clear, though audit_pages operationally subsumes page_facts for lists, creating mild overlap.
Both names use snake_case and are readable, but they follow different grammatical patterns (noun phrase 'page_facts' vs verb-object 'audit_pages'), so there is no single predictable convention.
Two tools is minimal for an SEO auditing server; each tool is broad and earns its place, but the surface feels thin and likely leaves users wanting more granular operations.
The pair covers single-page facts and bulk sitemap/list auditing, including aggregate problems—core SEO audit workflows. Minor gaps remain around historical comparisons or more granular inspection of individual resources like raw headers.