Mica Crypto MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Mica Crypto MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables secure communications with built-in EU AI Act compliance through the MCP protocol.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for EU AI Act compliance, providing risk classification of AI features and Article 50 transparency notices.21Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceUK AI regulation compliance MCP server enabling AI regulation tracking, risk classification, and impact assessment for AI systems deployed in the UK.23 PyPI-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEU AI Act Compliance - MCP server providing AI-powered tools and automation by MEOK AI Labs116 npm68 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for compliance automation of AI agents, enabling EU AI Act compliance, verifiable credentials, and decentralized identity management with 47 tools across 9 modules.26Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenance53 regulatory compliance evidence tools across 3 MCP servers for AI agents. MiCA authorization status, DORA evidence packs, stablecoin risk scoring (105+ tokens), macro intelligence (86 FRED series). Every response ECDSA-signed (ES256K), blockchain-anchored, audit-ready. Free tier, OAuth 2.0.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of MiCA regulation: AML overlay, CASP authorization, asset classification, market abuse, whitepaper requirements, and two database search tools. No overlapping purposes.
All tool names use snake_case with a consistent verb_noun structure (e.g., aml_overlay, check_casp_authorisation, classify_crypto_asset, list_regulations_in_db, market_abuse_check, search_regulation, whitepaper_requirements).
Seven tools cover a focused domain of MiCA crypto regulation, providing essential functionality without overwhelming or underserving the user.
The set covers major MiCA areas: AML, CASP authorization, asset classification, market abuse, whitepaper, and full-text search. Minor gaps like reporting requirements or stablecoin specifics are absent but acceptable for the scope.