Skip to main content
Glama
CSOAI-ORG

EU AI Act Compliance MCP

by CSOAI-ORG
OverviewSchemaRelated ServersScoreDiscussions
Python
Hybrid

generate_documentation

Produce an EU AI Act Annex IV-compliant technical documentation template. Fill in bracketed sections with system details, data, architecture, and risk management info.

Instructions

Generate Article 11 / Annex IV compliant technical documentation template.

Produces a complete markdown template following the Annex IV structure of the EU AI Act. Fill in the bracketed sections with your specific information.

Args: system_name: Name of the AI system. provider_name: Legal name of the AI system provider. provider_contact: Provider contact details (address, email, phone). version: System version number/identifier. intended_purpose: Clear description of the system's intended purpose. description: General description of what the system does. data_description: Description of training/validation/testing data used. architecture_description: Description of system architecture and algorithms. performance_metrics: Known accuracy/performance metrics (if available). risk_management_description: Description of risk management measures (if available). human_oversight_description: Description of human oversight measures (if available). caller: Identifier for rate limiting. tier: "free" (10 calls/day) or "pro" (unlimited, $29/mo).

Behavior: This tool generates structured output without modifying external systems. Output is deterministic for identical inputs. No side effects. Free tier: 10/day rate limit. Pro tier: unlimited. No authentication required for basic usage.

When to use: Use this tool when you need to assess, audit, or verify compliance requirements. Ideal for gap analysis, readiness checks, and generating compliance documentation.

When NOT to use: Do not use as a substitute for qualified legal counsel. This tool provides technical compliance guidance, not legal advice.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
system_nameYes
provider_nameYes
provider_contactYes
versionYes
intended_purposeYes
descriptionYes
data_descriptionYes
architecture_descriptionYes
performance_metricsNo
risk_management_descriptionNo
human_oversight_descriptionNo
callerNoanonymous
api_keyNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Tool Definition Quality

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The 'Behavior' section describes no side effects, deterministic output, rate limits, and auth requirements. Since no annotations are provided, the description fully covers behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections, but somewhat lengthy due to the detailed args list. It is front-loaded with the main purpose and uses formatting effectively.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers behavior, side effects, usage guidelines, and parameter descriptions. The inconsistency regarding tier/api_key is a minor gap, but otherwise complete for a 13-parameter tool with no annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning for most parameters (e.g., system_name, provider_name), but misses the 'api_key' parameter present in the schema and introduces a 'tier' parameter not in the schema. This inconsistency reduces clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates an Article 11/Annex IV compliant technical documentation template. This is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like audit_report or check_compliance, which have different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit 'When to use' and 'When NOT to use' sections provide clear context. It says use for compliance assessment, audit, and readiness checks, and warns against using as legal advice, guiding appropriate selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CSOAI-ORG/eu-ai-act-compliance-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server