Skip to main content
Glama
CSOAI-ORG

CSRD Compliance MCP

double_materiality_assessment

Assess double materiality by evaluating impact on people and planet alongside financial effects, then identifies relevant ESRS standards for CSRD compliance.

Instructions

Run a heuristic double materiality assessment. Double materiality = (a) impact on people/planet AND (b) financial impact on the entity. Returns material ESRS standards to report on.

Behavior: This tool is read-only and stateless — it produces analysis output without modifying any external systems, databases, or files. Safe to call repeatedly with identical inputs (idempotent). Free tier: 10/day rate limit. Pro tier: unlimited. No authentication required for basic usage.

When to use: Use this tool when you need to assess, audit, or verify compliance requirements. Ideal for gap analysis, readiness checks, and generating compliance documentation.

When NOT to use: Do not use as a substitute for qualified legal counsel. This tool provides technical compliance guidance, not legal advice.

Args: business_description (str): The business description to analyze or process. stakeholder_concerns (str): The stakeholder concerns to analyze or process. api_key (str): The api key to analyze or process.

Behavioral Transparency: - Side Effects: This tool is read-only and produces no side effects. It does not modify any external state, databases, or files. All output is computed in-memory and returned directly to the caller. - Authentication: No authentication required for basic usage. Pro/Enterprise tiers require a valid MEOK API key passed via the MEOK_API_KEY environment variable. - Rate Limits: Free tier: 10 calls/day. Pro tier: unlimited. Rate limit headers are included in responses (X-RateLimit-Remaining, X-RateLimit-Reset). - Error Handling: Returns structured error objects with 'error' key on failure. Never raises unhandled exceptions. Invalid inputs return descriptive validation errors. - Idempotency: Fully idempotent — calling with the same inputs always produces the same output. Safe to retry on timeout or transient failure. - Data Privacy: No input data is stored, logged, or transmitted to external services. All processing happens locally within the MCP server process.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
business_descriptionYes
stakeholder_concernsNo
api_keyNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Provides a comprehensive 'Behavioral Transparency' section covering side effects (read-only, stateless), authentication, rate limits, error handling, idempotency, and data privacy. No annotations provided, so description carries full burden and meets it excellently.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections, and the first sentence immediately states the purpose. However, it is somewhat lengthy; some behavioral details could be condensed without losing value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values are covered. Behavioral transparency is thorough. However, parameter semantics are weak (0% schema coverage, no compensation in description), leaving gaps for the agent to understand inputs. Overall moderate completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description's Args section merely repeats parameter names with generic phrases (e.g., 'The business description to analyze or process'), adding no meaningful detail about expected content, formats, or examples. The overall description is verbose but fails to clarify parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool performs a heuristic double materiality assessment, defining double materiality as impact on people/planet AND financial impact, and returns material ESRS standards. It is distinct from sibling tools like classify_entity or enforcement_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Includes explicit 'When to use' (compliance assessment, gap analysis) and 'When NOT to use' (not legal counsel) sections, providing clear guidance on appropriate contexts.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CSOAI-ORG/csrd-compliance-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server