Skip to main content
Glama
CSOAI-ORG

CRA Compliance MCP

by CSOAI-ORG
OverviewSchemaRelated ServersScoreDiscussions
Python
Remote

audit_annex_i

Audit Annex I essential cybersecurity requirements by comparing product properties and vulnerability handling against your current controls, identifying gaps for compliance documentation.

Instructions

Audit Annex I essential cybersecurity requirements (both Part 1 product properties and Part 2 vulnerability handling) against your current controls.

Behavior: This tool generates structured output without modifying external systems. Output is deterministic for identical inputs. No side effects. Free tier: 10/day rate limit. Pro tier: unlimited. No authentication required for basic usage.

When to use: Use this tool when you need to assess, audit, or verify compliance requirements. Ideal for gap analysis, readiness checks, and generating compliance documentation.

When NOT to use: Do not use as a substitute for qualified legal counsel. This tool provides technical compliance guidance, not legal advice.

Args: product_description (str): The product description to analyze or process. current_controls (str): The current controls to analyze or process. api_key (str): The api key to analyze or process.

Behavioral Transparency: - Side Effects: This tool is read-only and produces no side effects. It does not modify any external state, databases, or files. All output is computed in-memory and returned directly to the caller. - Authentication: No authentication required for basic usage. Pro/Enterprise tiers require a valid MEOK API key passed via the MEOK_API_KEY environment variable. - Rate Limits: Free tier: 10 calls/day. Pro tier: unlimited. Rate limit headers are included in responses (X-RateLimit-Remaining, X-RateLimit-Reset). - Error Handling: Returns structured error objects with 'error' key on failure. Never raises unhandled exceptions. Invalid inputs return descriptive validation errors. - Idempotency: Fully idempotent — calling with the same inputs always produces the same output. Safe to retry on timeout or transient failure. - Data Privacy: No input data is stored, logged, or transmitted to external services. All processing happens locally within the MCP server process.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
product_descriptionYes
current_controlsNo
api_keyNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Tool Definition Quality

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes a comprehensive Behavioral Transparency section covering side effects (read-only), authentication, rate limits, error handling, idempotency, and data privacy. Since no annotations are provided, the description fully carries the burden and does so excellently with no contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections (Behavior, When to use, When NOT to use, Args, Behavioral Transparency). It is somewhat verbose but not excessive. Could be slightly more concise, but the organization compensates.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (3 params, no schema descriptions, but has output schema), the description covers all relevant aspects: purpose, usage, behavior, error handling, and privacy. It leaves no critical gaps for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 0% description coverage. The description lists each parameter with a brief phrase (e.g., 'The product description to analyze or process.'). This adds some meaning beyond the title but lacks details on format, constraints, or examples. With low schema coverage, the description should provide more guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool audits Annex I essential cybersecurity requirements against current controls, with specific detail on Part 1 and Part 2. It distinguishes from siblings like classify_product and enforcement_status by focusing on compliance auditing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (assess, audit, verify compliance) and when NOT to use (not legal advice). Provides context for gap analysis and readiness checks. Lacks direct comparison to sibling tools, but the usage guidance is clear and actionable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CSOAI-ORG/cra-compliance-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server