Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
COSTRINITY

@costrinity/vitna-compliance-mcp

Official
by COSTRINITY
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to @costrinity/vitna-compliance-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Permission Guard

      AMEOBIUS-space
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A pre-action authorization server for AI agents that classifies tool calls into 14 intent categories, scores risk 0-100, and produces deterministic allow/deny/ask decisions with full audit trail.
      MIT

    • a2a-trustgate

      jyswee
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent compliance that screens actions before execution and records decisions in an immutable, SIEM-ready audit trail.
      84 npm
      -

    • Vizier

      vassiliylakhonin
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Owner-signed authorization before agent actions. Hosted Vizier v0.5.13 MCP: https://vizier.agendamcp.dpdns.org/mcp. ALLOW/BLOCK/REVIEW; anonymous calls never ALLOW. Your integration enforces the decision. SDK v0.5.13: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@agenda-intelligence/vizier-sdk. Grants are signed; legacy receipts are unsigned. Python stdio is a separate catalog.
      3
      7 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose, and descriptions explicitly clarify overlaps, such as breach_classify vs us_state_breach_deadline and india_sectoral_check vs india_regulators_directory. Validators target different identifiers and checks target different compliance regimes, so an agent can reliably choose the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and most follow a resource_action/status pattern (consent_check, gstin_validate, ai_act_classify, india_cross_border_status). Minor deviations exist, including vitna_-prefixed tools and noun-only lookups like global_compliance_map and us_state_breach_deadline, but the set remains readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    23 tools is on the heavy side for a single MCP server, sitting in the borderline 16-25 range. The compliance domain is broad, but several narrow validators and lookups could potentially be consolidated, making the surface feel somewhat sprawling.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers many advisory checks (consent, breach, DPIA, AI Act, cross-border, sectoral, ID validators), but lacks operational lifecycle tools such as consent create/update/revoke, DSAR handling, incident notification generation, and ROPA/audit retrieval. The surface is broad but incomplete for full compliance management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources