A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceA pre-action authorization server for AI agents that classifies tool calls into 14 intent categories, scores risk 0-100, and produces deterministic allow/deny/ask decisions with full audit trail.
MIT
@costrinity/vitna-compliance-mcp
Officialby COSTRINITY
Related Servers
Alternatives to @costrinity/vitna-compliance-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent compliance that screens actions before execution and records decisions in an immutable, SIEM-ready audit trail.124 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to screen proposed actions, enforce deterministic policies and limits, and produce tamper-proof signed audit receipts before any external side effect is executed.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceCompliance and guardrails infrastructure for AI agents, enabling safe operations within regulatory boundaries like GDPR and EU AI Act.6MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenancePre-execution governance for AI agents. 45 MCP tools for hold queues, audit trails, risk scoring, and policy enforcement. Validates agent actions before they execute.4554 npm1MIT
@vorionsys/mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for AI-agent governance using trust scoring, behavioral signals, and pre-flight action checks.1017 npm1Apache 2.0
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 23 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a distinct purpose, and descriptions explicitly clarify overlaps, such as breach_classify vs us_state_breach_deadline and india_sectoral_check vs india_regulators_directory. Validators target different identifiers and checks target different compliance regimes, so an agent can reliably choose the right tool.
Naming Consistency4/5
All names use snake_case and most follow a resource_action/status pattern (consent_check, gstin_validate, ai_act_classify, india_cross_border_status). Minor deviations exist, including vitna_-prefixed tools and noun-only lookups like global_compliance_map and us_state_breach_deadline, but the set remains readable.
Tool Count3/5
23 tools is on the heavy side for a single MCP server, sitting in the borderline 16-25 range. The compliance domain is broad, but several narrow validators and lookups could potentially be consolidated, making the surface feel somewhat sprawling.
Completeness3/5
The server covers many advisory checks (consent, breach, DPIA, AI Act, cross-border, sectoral, ID validators), but lacks operational lifecycle tools such as consent create/update/revoke, DSAR handling, incident notification generation, and ROPA/audit retrieval. The surface is broad but incomplete for full compliance management.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive