Shodai Agreements
Related Servers
Alternatives to Shodai Agreements
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for temporal state queries and cryptographic audit trails. Query historical entity state at any point in time, generate Merkle proofs of past state, and anchor contract snapshots for immutable provenance.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for tracking and verifying AI reasoning state, with signed action receipts, repo-history records, and preflight gating for tool calls.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides a sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflows, running entirely on your infrastructure with Ed25519 cryptographic signing for every action.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes nine local-first contract-ops CLIs as tools for contract extraction, linting, comparison, conversion, template vaults, and signed-contract vaults, with signing operations strictly human-gated.98 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access31MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for creating, settling, disputing, and refunding escrows on EVM chains.85 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or resource. There is no ambiguity between deploy, get, list, preflight, prepare, submit, validate operations. Even similar-sounding tools like get_agreement and get_agreement_document are clearly differentiated by their descriptions and return types.
All tool names consistently use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern. The verbs are descriptive (deploy, get, list, preflight, prepare, submit, validate) and the nouns accurately reflect the resource or context. Naming is predictable and systematic.
With 11 tools covering the full lifecycle of agreement management—from validation and preflight to deployment, state queries, and input submission—the count is well-scoped. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy or bloat.
The tool set covers the core workflows: validation, deployment preparation/signing, deploying, reading agreements/documents/state, listing, submitting inputs, and inspecting history. Missing are update/amend or delete/terminate operations, but these may be outside the domain's scope given the immutable nature of deployed agreements.