Skip to main content
Glama
CNSLabs

Shodai Agreements

by CNSLabs

Related Servers

Alternatives to Shodai Agreements

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for temporal state queries and cryptographic audit trails. Query historical entity state at any point in time, generate Merkle proofs of past state, and anchor contract snapshots for immutable provenance.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflows, running entirely on your infrastructure with Ed25519 cryptographic signing for every action.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes nine local-first contract-ops CLIs as tools for contract extraction, linting, comparison, conversion, template vaults, and signed-contract vaults, with signing operations strictly human-gated.
      98 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access
      3
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action or resource. There is no ambiguity between deploy, get, list, preflight, prepare, submit, validate operations. Even similar-sounding tools like get_agreement and get_agreement_document are clearly differentiated by their descriptions and return types.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names consistently use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern. The verbs are descriptive (deploy, get, list, preflight, prepare, submit, validate) and the nouns accurately reflect the resource or context. Naming is predictable and systematic.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools covering the full lifecycle of agreement management—from validation and preflight to deployment, state queries, and input submission—the count is well-scoped. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core workflows: validation, deployment preparation/signing, deploying, reading agreements/documents/state, listing, submitting inputs, and inspecting history. Missing are update/amend or delete/terminate operations, but these may be outside the domain's scope given the immutable nature of deployed agreements.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive