GPT Image 1 MCP
🚀 Schnellstart
npx -y @cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcp📋 Voraussetzungen
🔑 Umgebungsvariablen
💻 Beispielverwendung mit NPX
# Set your OpenAI API key
export OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-your-openai-api-key
# Optional: Set custom output directory
export GPT_IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR=/home/username/Pictures/ai-generated-images
# Run the server with NPX
npx -y @cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcp# Set your OpenAI API key
$env:OPENAI_API_KEY = "sk-your-openai-api-key"
# Optional: Set custom output directory
$env:GPT_IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR = "C:\Users\username\Pictures\ai-generated-images"
# Run the server with NPX
npx -y @cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcp:: Set your OpenAI API key
set OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-your-openai-api-key
:: Optional: Set custom output directory
set GPT_IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR=C:\Users\username\Pictures\ai-generated-images
:: Run the server with NPX
npx -y @cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcpRelated MCP server: OpenAI MCP
🔌 Integration mit MCP-Clients
🛠️ Einrichten in einem MCP-Client
{
"mcpServers": {
"gpt-image-1": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcp"
],
"env": {
"OPENAI_API_KEY": "PASTE YOUR OPEN-AI KEY HERE",
"GPT_IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR": "OPTIONAL: PATH TO SAVE GENERATED IMAGES"
}
}
}
}Beispielkonfigurationen für verschiedene Betriebssysteme
{
"mcpServers": {
"gpt-image-1": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcp"],
"env": {
"OPENAI_API_KEY": "sk-your-openai-api-key",
"GPT_IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR": "C:\\Users\\username\\Pictures\\ai-generated-images"
}
}
}
}{
"mcpServers": {
"gpt-image-1": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcp"],
"env": {
"OPENAI_API_KEY": "sk-your-openai-api-key",
"GPT_IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR": "/home/username/Pictures/ai-generated-images"
}
}
}
}Hinweis : Verwenden Sie für Windows-Pfade doppelte Backslashes (
\\), um den Backslash in JSON zu maskieren. Verwenden Sie unter Linux/macOS Schrägstriche (/).
✨ Funktionen
💡 Erweiterte Funktionen
🔄 So funktioniert es
📁 Verhalten des Ausgabeverzeichnisses
Installation und Verwendung
NPM-Paket
Dieses Paket ist auf npm verfügbar: @cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcp
Sie können es global installieren:
npm install -g @cloudwerxlab/gpt-image-1-mcpOder führen Sie es direkt mit npx aus, wie im Abschnitt „Schnellstart“ gezeigt.
Werkzeug: create_image
Generiert ein neues Bild basierend auf einer Textaufforderung.
Parameter
Parameter | Typ | Erforderlich | Beschreibung |
| Schnur | Ja | Die Textbeschreibung des zu generierenden Bildes (max. 32.000 Zeichen) |
| Schnur | NEIN | Bildgröße: „1024 x 1024“ (Standard), „1536 x 1024“ oder „1024 x 1536“ |
| Schnur | NEIN | Bildqualität: „hoch“ (Standard), „mittel“ oder „niedrig“ |
| ganze Zahl | NEIN | Anzahl der zu generierenden Bilder (1-10, Standard: 1) |
| Schnur | NEIN | Hintergrundstil: „transparent“, „undurchsichtig“ oder „auto“ (Standard) |
| Schnur | NEIN | Ausgabeformat: „png“ (Standard), „jpeg“ oder „webp“ |
| ganze Zahl | NEIN | Komprimierungsstufe (0-100, Standard: 0) |
| Schnur | NEIN | Benutzerkennung für die OpenAI-Nutzungsverfolgung |
| Schnur | NEIN | Moderationsstufe: „niedrig“ oder „auto“ (Standard) |
Beispiel
<use_mcp_tool>
<server_name>gpt-image-1</server_name>
<tool_name>create_image</tool_name>
<arguments>
{
"prompt": "A futuristic city skyline at sunset, digital art",
"size": "1024x1024",
"quality": "high",
"n": 1,
"background": "auto"
}
</arguments>
</use_mcp_tool>Antwort
Das Tool gibt Folgendes zurück:
Eine formatierte Textnachricht mit Details zu den generierten Bildern
Das/Die Bild(er) als Base64-kodierte Daten
Metadaten, einschließlich Token-Nutzung und Dateipfade
Werkzeug: create_image_edit
Bearbeitet ein vorhandenes Bild basierend auf einer Textaufforderung und einer optionalen Maske.
Parameter
Parameter | Typ | Erforderlich | Beschreibung |
| Zeichenfolge, Objekt oder Array | Ja | Die zu bearbeitenden Bilder (Base64-Zeichenfolge oder Dateipfadobjekt) |
| Schnur | Ja | Die Textbeschreibung der gewünschten Bearbeitung (max. 32.000 Zeichen) |
| Zeichenfolge oder Objekt | NEIN | Die Maske, die zu bearbeitende Bereiche definiert (Base64-Zeichenfolge oder Dateipfadobjekt) |
| Schnur | NEIN | Bildgröße: „1024 x 1024“ (Standard), „1536 x 1024“ oder „1024 x 1536“ |
| Schnur | NEIN | Bildqualität: „hoch“ (Standard), „mittel“ oder „niedrig“ |
| ganze Zahl | NEIN | Anzahl der zu generierenden Bilder (1-10, Standard: 1) |
| Schnur | NEIN | Hintergrundstil: „transparent“, „undurchsichtig“ oder „auto“ (Standard) |
| Schnur | NEIN | Benutzerkennung für die OpenAI-Nutzungsverfolgung |
Beispiel mit Base64-codiertem Bild
<use_mcp_tool>
<server_name>gpt-image-1</server_name>
<tool_name>create_image_edit</tool_name>
<arguments>
{
"image": "BASE64_ENCODED_IMAGE_STRING",
"prompt": "Add a small robot in the corner",
"mask": "BASE64_ENCODED_MASK_STRING",
"quality": "high"
}
</arguments>
</use_mcp_tool>Beispiel mit Dateipfad
<use_mcp_tool>
<server_name>gpt-image-1</server_name>
<tool_name>create_image_edit</tool_name>
<arguments>
{
"image": {
"filePath": "C:/path/to/your/image.png"
},
"prompt": "Add a small robot in the corner",
"mask": {
"filePath": "C:/path/to/your/mask.png"
},
"quality": "high"
}
</arguments>
</use_mcp_tool>Antwort
Das Tool gibt Folgendes zurück:
Eine formatierte Textnachricht mit Details zu den bearbeiteten Bildern
Die bearbeiteten Bilder als Base64-kodierte Daten
Metadaten, einschließlich Token-Nutzung und Dateipfade
🔧 Fehlerbehebung
🚨 Häufige Probleme
🔍 Fehlerbehandlung und -berichterstattung
Der MCP-Server verfügt über eine umfassende Fehlerbehandlung, die detaillierte Informationen liefert, wenn etwas schief geht. Wenn ein Fehler auftritt:
Fehlerformat : Alle Fehler werden mit folgendem zurückgegeben:
Eine klare Fehlermeldung, die beschreibt, was schief gelaufen ist
Der spezifische Fehlercode oder -typ
Zusätzlicher Kontext zum Fehler, sofern verfügbar
Verhalten des KI-Assistenten : Bei Verwendung dieses MCP-Servers mit KI-Assistenten:
Die KI meldet immer die vollständige Fehlermeldung, um bei der Fehlerbehebung zu helfen
Die KI erklärt die wahrscheinliche Fehlerursache in einfacher Sprache
Die KI schlägt konkrete Schritte zur Lösung des Problems vor
📄 Lizenz
🙏 Danksagungen
Available Tools
2 toolscreate_imageD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | Yes | ||
| background | No | ||
| n | No | ||
| output_compression | No | ||
| output_format | No | ||
| quality | No | ||
| size | No | ||
| user | No | ||
| moderation | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
create_image_editD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| image | Yes | ||
| prompt | Yes | ||
| background | No | ||
| mask | No | ||
| n | No | ||
| quality | No | ||
| size | No | ||
| user | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
- First observed
create_image - First observed
create_image_edit
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have overlapping purposes—both involve creating images—and without descriptions, it's unclear how they differ. 'create_image_edit' suggests editing an existing image, but this could easily be confused with the base 'create_image' tool, leading to potential misselection.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'create_image' as the base, and 'create_image_edit' extends this logically. The naming is predictable and clear, with no deviations in style or convention.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for an image-related domain, which typically requires operations like listing, retrieving, updating, or deleting images. This limited set may not support common workflows, making it under-scoped.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for an image server; there are no tools for reading, updating, deleting, or managing images beyond creation and editing. This will cause significant agent failures in handling image lifecycles or varied tasks.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for NanoBanana AI image generation and editing
Focused MCP server for OpenAI image/audio generation (v2.0.0). Wraps endpoints via HAPI CLI.
MCP server for Qwen Image 3 AI image generation
Generate AI images and videos from any compatible MCP client.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA server that provides AI-powered image generation, modification, and processing capabilities through the Model Context Protocol, leveraging Google Gemini models and other image services.18MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server enabling AI assistants to generate images through OpenAI's DALL-E API with full support for all available options and fine-grained control.19 npm1MIT
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides image generation capabilities using Google's Gemini 2 API, allowing users to generate multiple images with customizable parameters like prompts, aspect ratios, and person generation settings.188 npm5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides OpenAI's DALL-E 3 image generation capabilities, allowing LLMs to generate high-quality images through a standardized interface.18 npm1MIT