Skip to main content
Glama
CCCpan

Chinese Sensitive Words MCP Server

by CCCpan
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Chinese Sensitive Words MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-han

      zzmmgg654321-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI models with tools to proofread and format Chinese text before delivery, covering typos, punctuation, casing, spacing, and platform-specific character limits. It runs as a zero-dependency MCP service so the model checks and fixes its own Chinese writing automatically.
      4
      1
      MIT

    • xiaohongshu-viral-note-agent

      xuboboo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides 49 MCP tools for full-cycle Xiaohongshu content operations, enabling users to research trending topics, generate viral notes, verify compliance, analyze accounts, and publish with a single authorization.
      12
      MIT

    • glin-profanity-mcp

      glincker
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Content moderation and profanity detection MCP server with 19 tools, 24 language support, leetspeak/Unicode obfuscation detection, context-aware analysis, batch processing, and user tracking for AI-powered content safety.
      21 npm
      60
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one detects sensitive words in text, the other provides replacement suggestions. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_sensitive_words, get_word_suggestions), making them predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With two tools, the server covers the core workflow (detection and suggestion) for a specialized compliance checking domain. No unnecessary tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the primary needs but lacks a tool for quick single-word checking or batch processing. Minor gap for advanced use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources