Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to wphealthkit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An AI-powered security audit tool that analyzes codebases for vulnerabilities using real-time data from MITRE CWE and npm audit. It enables deep analysis of authentication, API security, and dependencies to provide structured findings and remediation steps.
      2
      6 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Universal AI security layer for code scanning, PII detection, prompt injection defense, secret detection, dependency auditing, and audit logging.
      27
      27 PyPI
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Deterministic supply-chain provenance, SBOM/AI-BOM generation, and dependency risk analysis for npm and PyPI packages, with 14 security rules and verifiable reports.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Security co-pilot for AI agents. Scans for vulnerabilities like prompt injection, infinite loops, and token bombing in AI Agents, audits MCP servers, verifies AGENTS.md governance, and generates EU AI Act compliance reports.
      10
      226 npm
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An AI-powered security audit tool that analyzes codebases for vulnerabilities using real-time MITRE CWE data and npm audit. It enables users to perform comprehensive scans for authentication issues, exposed secrets, and dependency risks with structured remediation steps.
      2
      6 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, such as starting audits versus retrieving results or fixes. A few pairs like get_fix_prompt/get_fix_plan and get_job_status/get_report overlap slightly, but their descriptions sufficiently clarify when to use each.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming generally follows a verb_noun pattern (audit_plugin, get_findings, generate_sbom). Minor deviations like audit_plugins_bulk and audit_plugin_zip have modifiers at the end, and the mix of get/list/check verbs is consistent but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 13 tools, the set is well-scoped for a security auditing service. Each tool serves a clear role in the audit lifecycle: initiation, status tracking, result retrieval, fix generation, and supplementary features like SBOM and telemetry.

    Completeness4/5

    The core audit workflow is well covered: start audits via slug, ZIP, or bulk; check status; retrieve reports and findings; generate fix prompts/plans; and flag false positives. Minor gaps like a missing list-all-audits or cancel-audit tool are workaroundable.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues