Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-lease-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI coding agents to collaborate on a project by coordinating tasks, file leases, and messages through a shared hub, preventing conflicts and enabling parallel development.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI coding agents to safely collaborate in the same git working tree by managing file ownership, merging writes, and preventing snapshot races.
      3 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coordinating Claude Code and Codex across separate Git worktrees with shared issue ownership, file reservations, messages, and explicit handoffs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents on different machines to share verbatim session context and coordinate file leases, preventing concurrent edits and allowing each agent to query the other's exact actions and words.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A coordination layer for coding agents that provides memorable identities, inbox/outbox messaging, searchable message history, and file lease management to prevent conflicts. Uses Git for human-auditable artifacts and SQLite for fast queries, enabling multiple agents to collaborate across projects without stepping on each other.
      2,144
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Lease tools (claim/release/owner), task queue tools (next_task/ack/retry/cancel), and history are clearly distinct. Some overlap exists among messaging/state tools—say vs send, and room vs inbox vs jobs—but their descriptions give enough distinction to avoid most misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case and only next_task is multiword, so surface formatting is consistent. However, the set mixes bare verbs (claim, release, say, ack) with nouns (owner, jobs, inbox, room, history), so there is no predictable verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the appropriate range for a coordination server covering leases, messaging, task delivery, and audit. Each tool maps to a distinct operation and the count does not feel bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lease lifecycle (claim/release/owner), task delivery lifecycle (send/next_task/ack/retry/cancel), messaging (say/inbox/room/jobs), and audit (history) are covered. Minor gaps remain: no way to list your active leases without releasing, and no global task listing beyond addressed items.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues