reset_xiaohongshu_login

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description mentions clearing the state directory, which is a destructive action, but lacks details on side effects (e.g., losing cookies, impact on other profiles) or warnings about consequences.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with action and resource, no unnecessary text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool with an output schema, the description is nearly complete. Could optionally mention the return value or success indication, but not required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, schema coverage is 100%. The description adds meaning by clarifying what state is cleared (browser state directory for Xiaohongshu).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb '清空' (clear) and resource '小红书浏览器状态目录', and distinguishes from sibling tools like login_xiaohongshu and reset_zhihu_login.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states it is used to re-run the first login process (用于重新走首次登录流程), implying usage context, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or provide alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.