get_environment_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are not provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Get', implying a read operation, but does not mention safety, error handling, or any side effects. This leaves the agent uninformed about potential issues like missing env_id.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at 4 words, but it sacrifices necessary detail. While front-loaded, it is under-specified and does not earn its place; a slightly longer description could provide crucial context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has an output schema, the description is not required to explain return values, but it lacks context about what environment configuration entails. For a tool with one parameter and simple purpose, it is minimally adequate but leaves gaps in understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the tool description adds no meaning for the only parameter 'env_id'. It does not explain what env_id represents or how to obtain valid values, making parameter usage ambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Get' and resource 'environment configuration', which is clear but lacks specificity to distinguish from other 'get' sibling tools like 'get_cluster_health' or 'get_project_details'. It does not elaborate on what aspects of the environment are included.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, or when it should not be used. For example, it could clarify that this is for reading static config vs. live status.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.