dismiss_alert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'dismiss' but does not mention side effects, reversibility, permissions, or what happens after dismissal. For a mutation operation, this is insufficient transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one lead sentence and a clear parameter list. Every sentence earns its place with no redundant information, and it is well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter tool with an output schema, the description covers the core purpose and parameters adequately. However, it lacks usage context and behavioral side effects, which are partially captured in other dimensions, but overall it is sufficiently complete for its complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description's Args section is essential. It explains alert_type with examples ('printer_repair', 'low_stock', etc.) and describes alert_id as the ID of the specific alert, adding meaning beyond the bare schema properties.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool dismisses a specific dashboard alert, with the verb 'dismiss' and resource 'dashboard alert'. It is distinct from all sibling tools, which include other inventory/project/printer operations but no other alert-dismissal tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by naming the action and parameters but provides no explicit when-to-use or alternative guidance. There are no sibling tools that do the same thing, so the absence of exclusions is acceptable, but no clear context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.