MCP Server Boilerplate
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@MCP Server Boilerplateshow me how to add a new tool that fetches weather data"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
MCP Server Boilerplate
A starter template for building MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers. This boilerplate provides a clean foundation for creating your own MCP server that can integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini, and other MCP-compatible AI assistants.
Purpose
This boilerplate helps you quickly start building:
Custom tools for AI assistants
Resource providers for dynamic content
Prompt templates for common operations
Integration points for external APIs and services
Related MCP server: MCP Server Boilerplate
Features
Two example tools: "hello-world" and "get-mcp-docs"
TypeScript support with ES2022 target and ES modules
Multi-client installation scripts (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini, etc.)
Automatic npm publishing workflow
Environment variable support via
.env.localClean project structure with Zod validation
How It Works
This MCP server template provides:
A basic server setup using the MCP SDK
Example tool implementation
Build and installation scripts
TypeScript configuration for development
The included example demonstrates how to create a simple tool that takes a name parameter and returns a greeting.
Getting Started
Option 1: Use the Published Package (Recommended)
You can use this MCP server directly without cloning:
# Run the server directly with npx
npx @r-mcp/boilerplateOption 2: Customize and Develop
# Clone the boilerplate
git clone <your-repo-url>
cd mcp-server-boilerplate
# Install dependencies
pnpm install
# Build the project
pnpm run build
# Start the server
pnpm startInstallation Scripts
This boilerplate includes convenient installation scripts for different MCP clients:
# Install to all MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini, MCP)
pnpm run install-server
# Install to specific clients
pnpm run install-desktop # Claude Desktop
pnpm run install-cursor # Cursor IDE
pnpm run install-code # Claude Code CLI
pnpm run install-code-library # Claude Code Library (~/.claude/mcp-library/)
pnpm run install-mcp # Local .mcp.json for development
# You can also combine multiple targets:
node scripts/update-config.js cursor code desktopThese scripts will:
Build the project automatically (TypeScript compilation + chmod permissions)
Configure clients to use
npx @r-mcp/<directory-name>@latest(auto-updating)Only the local
.mcp.jsonuses the development version (node dist/index.js)Include environment variables from
.env.localif present
Publishing Your Server
To publish your customized MCP server:
# Build, commit, and publish to npm in one command
pnpm run releaseThis script (scripts/build-and-publish.js) will:
Commit any pending changes first
Update package name to
@r-mcp/<directory-name>Update bin name to match directory
Increment patch version automatically
Build the TypeScript project
Commit version bump to git
Push to remote repository
Publish to npm with public access
Usage with MCP Clients
The installation scripts automatically configure your MCP clients. For reference, here's what gets added:
Production Clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini):
{
"mcpServers": {
"boilerplate": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@r-mcp/boilerplate@latest"],
"env": {
// Environment variables from .env.local are included here
}
}
}
}Local Development (.mcp.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"boilerplate": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/dist/index.js"],
"env": {
// Environment variables from .env.local are included here
}
}
}
}After running installation scripts, restart your MCP client to connect to the server.
Customizing Your Server
Adding Tools
Tools are functions that the AI assistant can call. Here's the basic structure:
server.tool(
"tool-name",
"Description of what the tool does",
{
// Zod schema for parameters
param1: z.string().describe("Description of parameter"),
param2: z.number().optional().describe("Optional parameter"),
},
async ({ param1, param2 }) => {
// Your tool logic here
return {
content: [
{
type: "text",
text: "Your response",
},
],
};
}
);Adding Resources
Resources provide dynamic content that the AI can access:
server.resource(
"resource://example/{id}",
"Description of the resource",
async (uri) => {
// Extract parameters from URI
const id = uri.path.split("/").pop();
return {
contents: [
{
uri,
mimeType: "text/plain",
text: `Content for ${id}`,
},
],
};
}
);Adding Prompts
Prompts are reusable templates:
server.prompt(
"prompt-name",
"Description of the prompt",
{
// Parameters for the prompt
topic: z.string().describe("The topic to discuss"),
},
async ({ topic }) => {
return {
description: `A prompt about ${topic}`,
messages: [
{
role: "user",
content: {
type: "text",
text: `Please help me with ${topic}`,
},
},
],
};
}
);Project Structure
├── src/
│ └── index.ts # Main MCP server implementation
├── scripts/
│ ├── update-config.js # Multi-client configuration installer
│ └── build-and-publish.js # Automated npm publishing workflow
├── dist/ # Compiled JavaScript (generated)
├── package.json # Project configuration
├── tsconfig.json # TypeScript configuration
├── CLAUDE.md # Claude Code instructions
├── .env.local # Environment variables (optional)
└── README.md # This fileDevelopment Workflow
Local Development
Make changes to
src/index.tsRun
pnpm run buildto compile TypeScriptTest your server with
pnpm startUse
pnpm run install-mcpfor local testingRestart your MCP client to load changes
Publishing Updates
Test your changes locally
Run
pnpm run releaseto publish to npmClients using
npx @r-mcp/<your-package>@latestauto-updateNo client reconfiguration needed
Environment Variables
Create a .env.local file for environment-specific configuration:
# .env.local
API_KEY=your-api-key
DATABASE_URL=your-database-urlThese variables are automatically included in MCP server configurations during installation.
Next Steps
Fork or clone this boilerplate
Customize the server name and tools in
src/index.tsAdd your own tools, resources, and prompts
Configure environment variables in
.env.localRun
pnpm run releaseto publish your serverInstall to clients with
pnpm run install-server
License
MIT
Available Tools
2 toolsget-mcp-docsD
Make an MCP server
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | The name of the MCP server |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The description 'Make an MCP server' doesn't reveal any behavioral traits - it doesn't specify whether this is a read or write operation, what permissions are needed, whether it's idempotent, what happens on success/failure, or any side effects. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is completely inadequate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While the description is technically concise with just three words, it's under-specified rather than efficiently informative. The single sentence doesn't earn its place by providing meaningful information - it's too brief to be helpful. Good conciseness balances brevity with completeness, which this description fails to achieve.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given that this is a single-parameter tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is completely inadequate. It doesn't explain what 'making an MCP server' entails, what the tool actually does, what it returns, or how to interpret results. For even a simple tool, this level of incompleteness makes it unusable without additional context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage with a single parameter 'name' clearly documented as 'The name of the MCP server'. The description doesn't add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides. With complete schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate since the schema does all the parameter documentation work.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Make an MCP server' is a tautology that essentially restates the tool name 'get-mcp-docs' in different words. It doesn't specify what 'make' means in this context (create, generate, fetch, etc.) or what 'MCP server' refers to. While it includes a verb+resource, it's too vague to distinguish from the sibling 'hello-world' tool or understand the actual purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of context, prerequisites, or comparison to the sibling 'hello-world' tool. It doesn't indicate what scenarios would require 'making an MCP server' or what the expected outcome should be.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
hello-worldB
Say hello to the user
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | The name of the user |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Say hello' implies a read-only, non-destructive action, but it doesn't specify output format, side effects, or any behavioral traits like error handling or performance characteristics. This is a significant gap for a tool with zero annotation coverage.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with a single sentence ('Say hello to the user') that directly states the tool's purpose. It's front-loaded with zero waste, making it easy for an agent to parse quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is minimally adequate. It states what the tool does but lacks details on behavioral context, usage guidelines, or output expectations, which are important even for simple tools to ensure correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds no parameter semantics beyond what the input schema provides. With 100% schema description coverage (the 'name' parameter is fully documented in the schema), the baseline score is 3. The description doesn't compensate with additional context about parameter usage or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Say hello to the user' clearly states the tool's action (say hello) and target (the user), providing a specific verb+resource. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from its sibling tool 'get-mcp-docs', which appears unrelated but could benefit from clearer distinction in a broader context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage based solely on the tool name and purpose.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: 'get-mcp-docs' is for server creation/development, while 'hello-world' is for user interaction. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the task.
The naming is inconsistent: 'get-mcp-docs' uses kebab-case with a verb-object structure, while 'hello-world' uses kebab-case but is a phrase rather than a clear action. There is no predictable pattern across the tools, making the set chaotic and hard to interpret systematically.
With only 2 tools, this server feels thin for a 'boilerplate' purpose, which typically implies a foundational or example set. The count is too low to adequately cover even basic MCP server operations, suggesting an incomplete or minimal implementation.
The server is severely incomplete for a boilerplate domain: it lacks essential tools for MCP server development (e.g., configuration, testing, deployment) and only includes a trivial 'hello-world' tool. There are significant gaps that would prevent agents from performing meaningful tasks.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Hosted MCP server connecting claude.ai, ChatGPT and other AI apps to your own computer
A simple Typescript MCP server built using the official MCP Typescript SDK and smithery/cli. This…
An MCP server that gives your AI access to the source code and docs of all public github repos
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building MCP servers that can integrate with Claude, Cursor, or other MCP-compatible AI assistants to create custom tools, resource providers, and prompt templates.20
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building custom MCP servers that can integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other AI assistants. Provides example tools, TypeScript support, and automated publishing workflows to help developers create their own AI assistant integrations.716
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building MCP servers with TypeScript support, example tools, and automated installation scripts for Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible AI assistants. Provides a foundation for creating custom tools, resource providers, and prompt templates.16
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building custom MCP servers that can integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other AI assistants. Provides example tools, TypeScript support, and automated publishing workflows to help developers quickly create their own MCP integrations.121
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BoosClues/new-MCP-builder'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server