get_children
Retrieve all sub-documents within a specified parent document. Use this to navigate document hierarchies.
Instructions
List child (sub-)documents of a document.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| document_id | Yes |
Retrieve all sub-documents within a specified parent document. Use this to navigate document hierarchies.
List child (sub-)documents of a document.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| document_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the action without disclosing behavioral details such as what happens for invalid document IDs, whether it is read-only, or the depth of child nesting returned.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but lacks structure. It could benefit from separating input and output details or adding a note about limitations.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of annotations and output schema, the description is insufficiently complete. It omits what the returned list contains, error handling, and pagination or ordering info.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to add meaning beyond the parameter name. It does not explain the format, constraints, or expected values for document_id.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists child documents of a parent document. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_documents (which lists all documents) and get_document (which retrieves a single document).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_favorites or list_trashbin. No context about prerequisites or typical use cases is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Bone2510/lasuite-docs-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server