Skip to main content
Glama
BogdanStamenovic

use-computer-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to use-computer-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate a real GNOME Wayland desktop through accessibility-tree widget actions, pointer/keyboard input, OCR, window management, and screen capture, optionally on a private headless session.
      33
      26 PyPI
      8
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to see and control a Linux desktop via Wayland/Hyprland, providing screenshots, structured desktop state, pointer/keyboard input, semantic window/workspace tools, and a policy engine for safe execution.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect, automate, and test desktop GUI applications on Wayland through window/desktop streaming, semantic AT-SPI accessibility tree inspection, and boundary-clamped mouse, keyboard, drag, and scroll input injection. It also manages application process lifecycle, captures window frames, and registers Python GUI scripts as native Linux desktop launchers.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to observe and control the user's live desktop by listing apps, reading accessibility trees, and performing clicks, typing, scrolling, dragging, and other input actions with per-action approvals and local audit archives.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct roles: read_screen, find, and ocr separate accessibility-tree reading from element lookup from text extraction, while listen and transcribe split recording from file transcription. The main ambiguity is between computer and computer_batch, but the batch tool is clearly described as a multi-step version of the same action set.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are readable and consistently lowercase snake_case, but conventions are mixed: some are imperative verb phrases (read_screen, open_app, wait_for, form_input) while others are bare nouns (computer, ocr, windows, clipboard, session) or awkward compounds (computer_batch). This is mildly inconsistent but not chaotic.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well-scoped for a desktop-control server; input, screen perception, accessibility, OCR, window management, waiting, clipboard, batch execution, audio transcription, and session control each earn a place. There is no obvious bloat or redundancy at the tool-count level.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core desktop-automation workflows well: mouse/keyboard input, screenshots, accessibility trees, OCR, app/window management, form filling, waiting, clipboard, and session control. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated audio-output tool and relying on computer for primitive actions like screenshot or typing, but these are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues