Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-tron

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for AI agents to interact with the JustLend DAO lending protocol on TRON, plus general TRON chain utilities like balances, transfers, and staking.
      37
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Multi-chain wallet MCP server that enables AI agents to manage Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Tron wallets via tools for addresses, balances, transactions, and token operations.
      91 npm
      CC BY-4.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 97 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes, especially block queries (get_block, get_latest_block, get_block_by_num, get_block_by_id, get_block_by_latest_num, get_block_by_limit_next) and transaction queries (get_transaction, get_transaction_info, get_transaction_by_id, get_transaction_info_by_id). While descriptions attempt to differentiate, the sheer number of similar functions makes it difficult for an agent to reliably choose the correct one.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming largely follows a snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_balance, list_witnesses, create_proposal), but there are inconsistencies such as get_now_block vs get_latest_block vs get_block_by_latest_num, broadcast_hex vs broadcast_transaction, and inconsistent use of 'v2' suffixes (get_delegated_resource vs get_delegated_resource_v2). Mixed prepositional phrases and varying noun forms reduce predictability.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 97 tools, the server is extremely over-scoped. The calibration indicates that 50+ tools is an extreme mismatch, and this server far exceeds that. Many tools appear redundant or overly granular, making the set unwieldy for an agent to navigate effectively.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers an extensive range of TRON functionalities: wallet management, blocks, transactions, contracts, staking, delegation, accounts, witnesses, proposals, events, and indexed data. It is nearly comprehensive, though minor gaps exist such as a full transaction simulation tool (only energy estimation is provided) and some potential missing governance features.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues