Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Open-Brain

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Builds a persistent knowledge graph from notes and conversations, enabling semantic search, entity exploration, and GTD task management from any MCP-compatible AI assistant.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Obsidian-backed knowledge graph with semantic search, entity extraction, and cross-session memory. 11 MCP tools. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible editor.
      30 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with a persistent knowledge graph and experience memory, featuring context-aware routing, progressive disclosure, decay-based forgetting, and automatic promotion of important knowledge. It offers 22 MCP tools for storing, recalling, connecting, and querying knowledge, experiences, preferences, and ideas.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-native productivity backend that gives your AI assistant persistent memory, pattern awareness, and computed intelligence about your work. 14 MCP tools for task management, daily planning, weekly review, and personal context.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Auto-extracts entities and relationships from natural conversations to build a personal knowledge graph. Provides MCP tools for storing and querying people, organizations, topics, and interactions.
      22 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, though some overlap exists. For example, 'deep_search' and 'search_thoughts' both handle search but with different approaches (multi-hop vs. hybrid), which could cause confusion. However, descriptions clarify their specific use cases, and other tools like 'capture_thought' and 'delete_thought' are clearly differentiated.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming conventions are mixed, with some tools using verb_noun patterns (e.g., 'capture_thought', 'delete_thought') and others using noun-only or compound terms (e.g., 'analyze', 'deep_search', 'serendipity_digest'). This inconsistency reduces predictability, but the names remain generally readable and descriptive of their functions.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 17 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a knowledge management system covering analysis, storage, retrieval, and maintenance. It avoids being overwhelming (e.g., not 25+), and each tool appears to serve a specific role in the domain, though some consolidation might improve focus.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for a thought management system, including CRUD operations (capture, update, delete), retrieval (search, list), analysis (analyze, stats), maintenance (refresh, review), and synthesis (weekly_review). There are no obvious gaps; tools support the full lifecycle from input to insights.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues