Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to RiskModels

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for decomposing US equity portfolio risk into factor exposures, with tools for portfolio risk, factor exposures, stress tests, and coverage checks using Barra-style fundamental factor models.
      7
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      What it does: * Portfolio risk profiling (per-asset and portfolio-level) * Target allocation based on risk profile (conservative/moderate/aggressive) * Diversification scoring via HHI index * Sharpe proxy calculation * Concentration risk detection * Rule-based rebalance recommendations
      10
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables quantitative risk analysis by calculating portfolio Value-at-Risk and Conditional VaR/Expected Shortfall across parametric and historical loss distributions, along with related option Greeks, Monte Carlo simulations, and fixed-income analytics through MCP.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Portfolio risk analytics MCP server — VaR, Monte Carlo simulation, stress testing, portfolio optimization, options Greeks, and correlation analysis. Real market data via Yahoo Finance. Free tier available, Pro at $29/mo.
      10
      48 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      The verifiable risk engine for autonomous agents: deterministic, self-verifying financial calculations that an agent can delegate and prove. It covers liquidation and funding, position sizing and risk of ruin, options Greeks and margin, LP divergence, treasury concentration and depeg, execution quality checks, plus intelligence on options, DeFi, prediction markets, and transaction safety analysis.
      6 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource+action and nearly every description includes explicit 'not for X (use Y)' routing, e.g. the closely related get_returns vs get_return_attribution vs get_residual_returns vs get_residual_signal are clearly separated. The four portfolio tools (analyze_portfolio, get_portfolio_risk_snapshot, portfolio_exposure, decompose_selection_vs_drift) overlap most, but size/short/long-only/purpose boundaries are spelled out, so selection is tractable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the riskmodels_ prefix and most follow a get_<noun> or verb_noun pattern (get_stock_snapshot, get_rankings, screen_rankings, analyze_portfolio). A few drop the verb or use noun phrases (decompose, compare, portfolio_exposure, decompose_selection_vs_drift), which is a minor deviation but still readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    24 tools is on the heavy side but the server spans a genuinely broad domain: single-stock risk, returns/attribution, macro, screening, portfolios, funds, 13F filers and ETFs. Each tool maps to a distinct endpoint and earns its place, so the count is justified rather than bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage is comprehensive across the equity-risk lifecycle: fundamentals, metrics snapshots, per-stock and universe rankings/screens, returns and factor/residual attribution, macro factors and correlations, peers/cohorts, entity search, and full portfolio construction/hedging/attribution. The fund, filer, ETF and benchmark-fit tools round out the security-master side, leaving no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive