Proxmox MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Proxmox MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for Proxmox VE with 68 tools and 4 resources covering VMs, containers, storage, networking, clusters, HA, backups, firewall, and access control.68-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes Proxmox VE node/cluster as tools for MCP clients, enabling management of VMs and containers including power control, resource reconfiguration, snapshots, and backups.20MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with the Proxmox Virtual Environment API, enabling management of VMs, containers, storage, and cluster resources through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn open-source MCP server for managing Proxmox environments, including nodes, virtual machines, and containers. It enables users to perform inventory checks, status monitoring, and control operations directly through MCP-compatible tools.115 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for Proxmox VE that enables read-only cluster inspection, VM/container lifecycle operations, snapshots, migration, and provisioning with safe confirmation gates.28MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for full Proxmox VE management - VMs, containers, storage, backups, networking.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 92 tools
Multiple tool boundaries are unclear: proxmox_guest_resize (CPU/memory) vs proxmox_guest_disk_resize (storage) are easily confused, and node queries are split across proxmox_node, proxmox_node_info, and proxmox_node_config with overlapping network/DNS actions. Disk operations are also scattered across proxmox_vm_disk and proxmox_guest_disk_*, creating ambiguous choices.
Most tools follow a proxmox_<resource>_<action> snake_case pattern, but the set mixes action-in-tool-name (proxmox_guest_start) with action-parameter designs (proxmox_node, proxmox_cluster). There are also outliers like proxmox_create_vm/proxmox_create_lxc (versus the generic proxmox_guest_* Family) and proxmox_get_next_vmid which breaks the resource-first convention.
With 92 tools, this server is far beyond an effective scope and will overwhelm agent tool selection. Even for a full hypervisor-management API, grouping related operations would make the set far more usable.
The tool surface is impressively broad and covers most core Proxmox domains: guest lifecycle (creation, start/stop, clone, migrate, template), snapshots, backups, storage, Ceph, SDN, users/ACLs, firewall, HA, and node administration. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit guest rename, backup restore lacks granular options), but common workflows are essentially fully covered.