Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to fanar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and developers to query Quranic verses, Hadith, Tafsir, and classical Islamic heritage texts through a single federated MCP endpoint with unified tools and caching.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables transcription and subtitling of Tunisian Derja mixed with French and English, speech and voiceover generation, translation, and Arabizi–Arabic script conversion inside MCP clients. It also supports speaker diarization, subtitle translation, transcript search, and audio editing.
      16
      488 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables bilingual Arabic/English knowledge assistance through MCP, including knowledge base inspection, document retrieval, arithmetic evaluation, and Hijri-Gregorian calendar conversion.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Serves a scholar-approved Islamic corpus of Qur'an and hadith passages to any MCP client with server-side refusal enforcement. Enables natural-language questioning, retrieval, policy checking, and honest corpus coverage reporting while preventing fabricated answers.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI clients with fast, hallucination-free access to the Quran through 13 MCP tools, covering search, navigation, morphology, tafsir, translations, and surah background over stdio and Streamable HTTP.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct modality or task (chat, QA, translation, TTS, STT, image, moderation, poetry), and the deep_research/deep_research_result pair is clearly start-vs-poll. The only mild overlap is fanar_chat vs fanar_islamic_qa, since both answer questions with a language model, though the descriptions do distinguish grounded-citation QA from general chat.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent fanar_ snake_case prefix with a predictable verb/noun structure (list_models, validate_quotations, generate_image, deep_research_result). A few names are bare verbs or nouns (chat, translate, transcribe, moderate, poem) rather than verb_noun, but the convention is still readable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well-scoped for a multimodal AI API, with one tool per capability and a clean async pair for deep research. No redundant or filler tools appear to pad the count.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the major modalities (chat, QA, quotation validation, research, image, translation, TTS, STT, moderation, poetry) plus model listing and a full start/poll lifecycle for deep research. Minor gaps exist, such as no job cancellation/listing or embedding endpoint, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues