Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to fanar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and developers to query Quranic verses, Hadith, Tafsir, and classical Islamic heritage texts through a single federated MCP endpoint with unified tools and caching.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables bilingual Arabic/English knowledge assistance through MCP, including knowledge base inspection, document retrieval, arithmetic evaluation, and Hijri-Gregorian calendar conversion.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Serves a scholar-approved Islamic corpus of Qur'an and hadith passages to any MCP client with server-side refusal enforcement. Enables natural-language questioning, retrieval, policy checking, and honest corpus coverage reporting while preventing fabricated answers.
      6
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI clients with fast, hallucination-free access to the Quran through 13 MCP tools, covering search, navigation, morphology, tafsir, translations, and surah background over stdio and Streamable HTTP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Azan-MCP is an open-source Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that brings a comprehensive suite of Islamic utilities directly into AI assistants such as Claude Desktop.
      34
      380
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct modality or task (chat, QA, translation, TTS, STT, image, moderation, poetry), and the deep_research/deep_research_result pair is clearly start-vs-poll. The only mild overlap is fanar_chat vs fanar_islamic_qa, since both answer questions with a language model, though the descriptions do distinguish grounded-citation QA from general chat.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent fanar_ snake_case prefix with a predictable verb/noun structure (list_models, validate_quotations, generate_image, deep_research_result). A few names are bare verbs or nouns (chat, translate, transcribe, moderate, poem) rather than verb_noun, but the convention is still readable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well-scoped for a multimodal AI API, with one tool per capability and a clean async pair for deep research. No redundant or filler tools appear to pad the count.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the major modalities (chat, QA, quotation validation, research, image, translation, TTS, STT, moderation, poetry) plus model listing and a full start/poll lifecycle for deep research. Minor gaps exist, such as no job cancellation/listing or embedding endpoint, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues