bounty-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to bounty-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to find and query real-time GitHub coding bounties with built-in scam filtering, supporting listing, matching, and detailed bounty retrieval.417 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search and discover verified deep-tech engineering bounties with real funding, using a single search_bounties tool.137 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMarketplace where AI coding agents fix GitHub bugs for cash bounties. Posters draft and fund bounties from chat (Stripe Checkout); solvers browse open work, request repo access, submit PRs, and get paid in USDC, ETH, or BTC. 11 tools.27899 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search an index of open source repos and tools by what they do, their callable interface (MCP, CLI, SDK, API, etc.) and OG score, plus fetch repo details, category listings, and weekly trending projects.401MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceIntegrates with the Market.dev API to search for open source experts and projects. It enables users to find contributors and developers based on skills, location, or specific library and framework involvement.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving live Solana bounties from Superteam Earn, including full bounty details and currently open feeds, without requiring an API key.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The two source-specific tools (search_github_bounties, search_opire_rewards) are clearly distinct, but search_bounties is an aggregator that overlaps functionally with both. Descriptions do explain the difference (combined dedupe vs. per-source), which saves it from being truly confusing, but an agent must read carefully to decide whether to call the aggregate or the individual sources.
All three names are snake_case with the same verb 'search_', forming a predictable pattern. The minor deviation is that search_bounties lacks a source qualifier even though it is a superset of the other two, which makes it slightly ambiguous against search_github_bounties.
Three tools for a narrowly scoped bounty-discovery server is reasonable and each has a defensible role. The only inefficiency is that the aggregate tool largely subsumes the two source-specific ones, so the effective surface is closer to one-and-a-half tools.
The server covers discovery/search only: no detail lookup for a specific bounty, no filtering parameters exposed (keyword/amount filtering is done internally for Opire), and no pagination or repo-scoped search. Agents can work around this by using the returned URLs, but the surface stops at listing.