Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-envelope-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Agent network intelligence for trust verification, broker discovery, and capability matching. Ed25519 identity, graph-based trust scoring, USDC payments, and MCP tools for agent registration, search, and trust attestation.
      614 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage identity, permissions, secrets, and verifiable proofs through a hosted MCP server, letting clients sign in and check what an agent may do before it acts.
      121 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Universal governance layer for AI agents — MCP-native, fail-closed, LNN interpretability. Governed receipts, IPFS audit proofs, and rollback for any agent in any framework.
      3
      56 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool addresses a distinct operation: public signature verification, agent record retrieval, action verification, and capability minting. The two verification tools are clearly separated by context and required credentials, so there is no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the ae_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, which is predictable overall. However, ae_verify_sovereign uses an adjective-like modifier and ae_mint is a single verb, slightly deviating from the verb_noun pattern of the others.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped and focused on the envelope verification and minting domain. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the count is neither too thin nor excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core operations including public verification, record lookup, action verification, and capability minting. While there might be gaps such as revocation or listing, the primary lifecycle appears adequately represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues