A
licenseC
qualityD
maintenanceEnables interaction with Asana through natural language, supporting task and project management via MCP clients like Claude.
26
MIT
Asana MCP Server
by BlZvi
Related Servers
Alternatives to Asana MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides a standardized interface for interacting with Asana's tools and services through a unified API, enabling AI assistants to manage tasks, projects, and workflows.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables comprehensive Asana workspace management through natural language, supporting task tracking, project planning, team collaboration, and workflow automation across workspaces, projects, sections, and tasks.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Asana workspaces, projects, and tasks via the Asana REST API. Supports natural language queries through the Pipeworx gateway.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with ClickUp workspaces through natural language - search tasks, manage workflows, track time, collaborate via comments, and access complete task context including comments and images.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage tasks, projects, workspaces, schedules, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, and statuses in Motion through natural language conversations.Apache 2.0
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 86 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct resource+action pairs, and the singular/plural get patterns (e.g., asana_get_project vs asana_get_projects) help. However, with 86 tools there is mild risk of confusing similar operations like asana_add_task_dependencies vs asana_add_task_dependents, and the many list-by-entity variants (project/section/tag) require careful reading.
Naming Consistency4/5
The asana_verb_noun pattern is consistently applied, with verbs like get, create, update, delete, add, remove, search. Minor deviations include mixing 'get' and 'list' for collections (asana_get_users_for_workspace vs asana_list_workspaces) and the presence of asana_typeahead alongside search tools, but overall the naming is predictable.
Tool Count1/5
86 tools is far beyond the typical well-scoped MCP server range. Even for a large API like Asana, this is excessive and will overwhelm agents, increasing selection latency and the chance of choosing the wrong tool despite clear descriptions.
Completeness5/5
The tool surface covers nearly every major Asana entity (workspaces, teams, users, projects, tasks, subtasks, sections, portfolios, goals, tags, custom fields, attachments, time tracking, stories) with CRUD operations where applicable. Advanced analysis tools (history, flow metrics, velocity, comparable tasks) add depth. No critical dead ends are evident.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues