Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
JEV_PYTHONYesAbsolute path to the Python interpreter to run the client.
JEV_SSH_HOSTNoSSH host alias for the remote GPU server.
JEV_SSH_CONFIGNoAbsolute path to the SSH configuration file for remote access.
JEV_REMOTE_ROOTNoAbsolute path to the repository root on the remote server.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
decideA

Return yes/no (noul), choice or score decisions and elapsed seconds using DiffusionGemma. request.questions maps IDs to {type, instructions, criteria}; choice criteria map names to descriptions or null; score criteria are ordered labels. state is optional evidence; sources_only:true restricts evidence. image/state_files read local files and send them to the configured decision server. Files are not modified. Probabilities are uncalibrated and normalized within the supplied candidates, not factual correctness probabilities. Explain this when asked rather than repeating a disclaimer in every result.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. The tool's single responsibility is clear from its description.

Naming Consistency5/5

With only one tool, there are no naming inconsistencies to evaluate. The name 'decide' is a simple, verb-based descriptor matching its function.

Tool Count3/5

A single tool feels thin for a server, even though it supports multiple decision types internally. This falls at the low end of the borderline range.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers yes/no, choice, and score decisions, with evidence and file handling. Minor gaps include lack of server configuration or status inspection, but core decision functionality is well covered.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues