Skip to main content
Glama

Full domain report

full_domain_report

Run a comprehensive domain analysis combining WHOIS, DNS, SSL, security headers, reputation, and subdomain checks into a single security score and rating.

Instructions

Runs every analyzer (WHOIS, DNS, SSL, security headers, reputation, subdomains) in parallel and returns a combined report with an overall security score and A+ to F rating.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYesDomain name to analyze, e.g. "example.com" (protocol, www. and paths are stripped automatically)
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Mentions parallel execution and output format, but no annotations exist. Does not disclose potential rate limits, timeouts, or destructive nature. Adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence efficiently conveys purpose, scope, and output. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Describes output (score and rating) but omits details like inclusion of individual analyzer results. No output schema to compensate, leaving some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Single parameter with 100% schema coverage. Description adds no meaningful detail beyond the schema's own example and stripping behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'runs', resource 'every analyzer', and outcome 'combined report with score and rating'. Distinct from sibling tools which are individual analyzers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implicitly indicates use when comprehensive analysis is desired, but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance relative to siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Bishop81/domainintel-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server