local-apple-data
Related Servers
Alternatives to local-apple-data
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA macOS MCP server that provides AI agents with secure access to Calendar, Reminders, Notes, and Health data via native Apple APIs.3020MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP servers to interact with Apple's Mail, Notes, Reminders, and Calendar apps on macOS, enabling search, read, and write operations with configurable permissions and a single Full Disk Access grant.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Apple Calendar, Mail, Reminders, and Files on macOS using native frameworks.15 npm21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives an AI assistant access to IMAP/SMTP mailboxes to read, search, organize, draft, and send email, with local mirroring and full-text search, no third-party data path, and credentials stored only in the macOS Keychain.6 npmMIT

Honeycrispofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP servers for your Mac's real data — Mail, Calendar, files — with safety rails you can audit. Local-first, no accounts, no cloud, with dry-run defaults and human approval gates.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants comprehensive access to Apple Mail accounts, enabling email discovery, reading, flag management, and server-side message retrieval.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Tools are grouped by domain with distinct operations (search, get, export). Each tool targets a specific resource and action, e.g., notes_get_content vs notes_get_metadata, or reminders_due vs reminders_search. Overlaps are minimal and clarified by descriptions.
Most tools follow a consistent <domain>_<verb>_<object> snake_case pattern. However, some deviations exist: 'reminders_due' lacks a verb, and 'reminders_eventkit_search' includes an extra specifier. Overall pattern is clear but not perfectly uniform.
30 tools cover many Apple data domains (calendar, contacts, mail, etc.). While each domain has a reasonable number (2-3 tools), the total count is high. It is justified for the broad scope but feels heavy.
For each domain, the set provides search, get metadata, and get content (or export). Diagnostics are included. Missing mutation/delete operations are intentional (read-only). Minor gaps include no bulk operations or filter criteria beyond title, but core workflows are covered.