Clojars-MCP-Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Clojars-MCP-Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides live Maven Central dependency inspection with stability filtering, version comparison, CVE checks, and POM-aware upgrade recommendations for MCP-capable clients.35MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancemaven-mcp gives AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Grok Build and any MCP client) live knowledge about JVM dependencies. It looks up the latest versions on Maven Central, finds outdated dependencies in Maven, Gradle and version catalog files, checks known vulnerabilities via OSV.dev, pulls changelogs and licenses, and builds dependency graphs with deps.dev. It's a single-file Python 3.9+ serve2136MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDependency intelligence for AI agents. CVE scanning, health checks, upgrade planning.9516 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides Maven artifact version resolution with caching, logging, and pre-release filtering for Maven Central.124 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to retrieve maintainer-written release notes and compare installed versus target dependency versions, search packages, and report on projects pushed to a dashboard.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching Maven Central artifacts, retrieving versions, and analyzing dependencies via natural language.5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: checking version existence, retrieving version history, and getting the latest version. The descriptions make it unambiguous what each tool does, and an agent would have no difficulty selecting the right tool for each specific query about Clojars dependencies.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get' or 'check' verbs and descriptive nouns like 'clojars_version_exists', 'clojars_history', and 'clojars_latest_version'. The naming is uniform, predictable, and uses snake_case throughout, making it easy for agents to understand and work with.
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a dependency management domain, as it lacks basic operations like searching for dependencies, listing available artifacts, or fetching dependency metadata beyond version info. While the tools are well-defined, the count is borderline low for the apparent scope of interacting with Clojars.
There are significant gaps in the tool surface for a Clojars server. Missing are essential operations such as searching for dependencies, retrieving artifact details (e.g., authors, licenses), or managing dependencies (e.g., adding/removing). The current tools only cover version-related queries, leaving agents unable to perform common dependency management tasks, which will likely cause failures in broader workflows.