Skip to main content
Glama
Bidda-Ai

bidda-mcp

by Bidda-Ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to bidda-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Kanonik

      Kanonik-LLC
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a typed compliance model and governance runtime that lets AI draft policies, assess controls, find framework gaps, and build verifiable audit trails across frameworks like ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2, GDPR, NIST CSF 2.0, and HIPAA. Every write is gated by a server-side verifier and human approval, producing a tamper-evident record.
      Apache 2.0

    • hive-mcp-audit-readiness

      srotzin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Computes multi-jurisdictional AI compliance readiness scores with sourced penalty math, enabling gap analysis and audit tier recommendations.
      MIT

    • Nexus Finance

      djtellado
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI workbench for financial contract analysis, risk analytics (VaR/CVaR, RWA Basel III), regulatory compliance (EMIR, REMIT, MiFID II, CBAM, EUDR) and counterparty due diligence (KYB/UBO, OFAC, IMO). Zero Retention. 8 MCP tools.
      8
      28 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct compliance function: browsing, compliance checking, jurisdiction comparison, node consultation, attestation, drift detection, export, etc. No two tools overlap in purpose; descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., browse_topics, check_action_compliance). 'obligation_deltas' breaks this pattern (noun_noun), but the deviation is minor and the overall style remains consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the server covers a complex domain (regulatory compliance) without being overwhelming. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the number is appropriate for the scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers discovery, compliance checking, attestation, monitoring, and export. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no node update/delete), but core workflows like search, assessment, and audit are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources