A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceReputation scoring for AI agent wallets on Base. 9 tools for trust scores, fraud checks, blacklist lookups, leaderboard, badge generation, and agent registration with x402 payment verification.
9
40 npm
1
MIT
agentradar
by Bichev
Related Servers
Alternatives to agentradar
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAutonomous escrow and reputation arbiter for AI agent commerce. Inspect agent trust scores, verify corporate KYA liability mandates, and execute zero-loss x402 escrow on Base.31MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to assess counterparty risk, token danger, and wallet creditworthiness on Base by analyzing contract powers and controlling wallet reputation.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceCounterparty risk scoring for agentic commerce. Scores wallets, domains, IPs, and companies 0-100 before AI agents transact via x402 micropayments on Base13MIT
- FlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceTrust infrastructure for AI agents on Base. DEX Spread Oracle (live Uniswap V3 prices), on-chain escrow, insurance pool, and collective knowledge base. 7 smart contracts. Pay-per-query via x402 micropayments in USDC.6-
AgentRiskofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePre-Trade Security & Risk Analysis Layer for Autonomous DeFi Agents on Base using x402 protocol.-
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 18 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. While get_score and verify_agent both return trust scores, the former is a fast cached version and the latter is a full 6-signal verification, making them differentiable. No two tools overlap significantly.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., add_scam_wallet, verify_agent, get_attestations). Verbs like 'get', 'lookup', 'list', 'check' are used consistently, making the naming predictable and intuitive.
Tool Count5/5
With 18 tools, the server provides comprehensive coverage for AI agent trust verification and scam tracking without being excessive. Each tool addresses a specific need, and the count is well-scoped for the domain.
Completeness5/5
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: adding/reporting scams, checking scams, verifying agents (cached and full), comparing, explaining scores, attestations (create, list, get by tx), identity and reputation lookups, URI resolution, badge generation, and API management (health, pricing, stats). No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive