Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP ML Agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to train and evaluate Logistic Regression and KNN models for breast cancer diagnosis, generate predictions and SHAP explanations, select the best-performing model, and export Parquet audit logs through MCP tools.
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables training, predicting, evaluating, and explaining Logistic Regression and KNN models for breast cancer classification through MCP tools. It also supports model selection, SHAP explanations, and Parquet audit exports.
      8
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to train and compare breast-cancer classification models, obtain sample inputs, make predictions with Logistic Regression or KNN, evaluate metrics, select the best model, generate SHAP explanations, and export Parquet audit logs through MCP tools.
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to query de-identified FHIR-shaped hospital data through audited, read-only tools for patients, encounters, conditions, observations, medications, and interaction checks, while any medication write stays a draft that a clinician must confirm out-of-band.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with synthetic NIH-style clinical research data through tools for searching publications, querying patient metadata, analyzing AAA measurements, and retrieving protocol guidance.
      5
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct pipeline stage (training, sampling, per-model prediction, metrics, selection, explanation, export). The only mild overlap is predict_both versus the two single-model predict tools, but the descriptions make the convenience-versus-specific distinction clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (train_models, get_sample_input, predict_knn, select_best_model, export_parquet_audit). Two deviate: confusion_matrix_metrics is a bare noun phrase and shap_explain_selected is an awkward ordering, but the set remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools neatly cover one end-to-end classification workflow with no padding. Each tool earns its place: train, sample, predict, evaluate, select, explain, export.

    Completeness4/5

    The full lifecycle is covered: training, sample input, prediction for both models, agreement check, metrics, model selection, SHAP explanation, and audit export. Minor gaps exist (no explicit way to inspect/list saved models or retrain a single model), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing