Skip to main content
Glama
BezaCore-Labs

never4ga-mcp

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to never4ga-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, local-first memory for coding agents with Markdown as the source of truth, exposed via CLI, loopback API, MCP, and Codex hooks for context retrieval and durable writes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Unifies cited transcript search, auto-compressed session context, and hand-curated notes behind a single MCP server, letting AI coding agents look up past discussions, check what was just happening, and store or recall durable facts across projects.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to maintain persistent project context, including rules, decisions, environment intelligence, and Git history, using a local-first MCP server with automatic project detection and token-efficient retrieval.
      13
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: session lifecycle (startup, checkpoint, wrap), vault retrieval (search, get_concept, context_focus), and work tracker operations (search, get, create, update, comment) are separated by domain prefixes and descriptions. Overlap is minimal, and the descriptions clarify boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the never4ga_ prefix and snake_case, which makes them groupable, but the action ordering varies: some use noun_verb (work_get, workspace_resolve), others verb_noun (get_concept), and several are bare verbs/nouns (wrap, decide, search). This is mostly consistent with minor deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is at the upper end of the ideal range, but each tool maps to a distinct operation in session management, vault access, and work tracking. The set is well-scoped with no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle and retrieval workflows are covered, including session start/checkpoint/wrap, vault search and concept retrieval, and work item create/read/update/comment. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no work item delete or direct concept update/delete), but these may be intentional or manageable via other tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues